Masthead header

How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera

By Photographer Patrick J. Endres

Updated 3/12/2015


THIRD EDITION released March 2015

This article is a brief overview on how to photograph the northern lights. It is a kick-starter–so to speak. It will get you going but if you are planning a trip I strongly suggest that you get my in-depth eBook, now in its 3rd edition, which expands considerably on the information discussed below.

I’ve guided aurora photography tours for two decades and I’ve seen many mistakes, and made many of my own, resulting in the genesis for this eBook. There is a huge investment in time and money to get yourself well positioned to photograph the aurora, and that investment is too great to sacrifice to the misfortune of not being properly prepared. Photography wisdom says prepare to maximize your options when the action happens.

Buy downloadable PDF

How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera


For many, just viewing the northern lights is a life-long dream. And to capture them with a camera is both a thrilling and awe inspiring experience. Before the advent of the digital camera, photographing the aurora borealis with slide film was complicated and often involved a good deal of experimenting. Back then clients were attached to the hip looking for experienced-based guidance on exposure times and camera settings. While the advent of the digital camera has not removed the need for experience, its ability to provide  immediate exposure feedback has opened up photographic opportunities for many that may have otherwise been failed attempts. With today’s average digital camera and a good lens and tripod, you are likely to get some very satisfactory images.

This article is intended to give you some necessary information to help guide you in your northern lights photography venture. While much of what is written below is general in nature and applies to most all digital cameras, the many, many brands and models have their own uniqueness. I will focus on Canon DSLR’s, since that is what I shoot and know best.


Choosing a destination to photograph the aurora.


Moon rise over the Chandalar shelf at midnight, Brooks range, Alaska. © Patrick J. Endres

Because the aurora are drawn to the earth’s magnetic poles, far northern & southern latitudes offer excellent opportunities for viewing auroral displays. Some points to consider when selecting a location for aurora photography:

  • Geographic Latitude: It would be ideal, although not necessary to find a spot within the auroral belt. (According to Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu, this is the polar region where the aurora is visible about two-thirds of the year). I live in Fairbanks, about 65 degrees latitude, which is geographically well situated for aurora viewing.
  • Light Pollution Free: Go somewhere free of light pollution, far from city lights or airports.
  • Direction/Orientation: Most of the shooting orientation will be between the northwest and southeast sky. With this in mind, position yourself to shoot with light sources (towns or cities) to your south. When solar storms are very strong and hit the earth’s atmosphere with strength, both the northern and southern sky will contain the aurora, and often in some wild colors.


Aurora activity is directly connected with solar storm activity on the surface of the sun. Therefore, being aware of this will help determine the optimal times for viewing the most active aurora displays. According to, statistically speaking, March is the most geomagnetically active month of the year; October is a close second. Although the reasons why are not fully understood, there is no doubt that equinoxes favor auroras. The data from their website plots geomagnetic activity per month, which is overlaid with the cloudiness factor in the diagram below taken from my eBook. Remember however, that clear skies can be equally, if not more, productive from a statistical perspective also.

Screen shot from my eBook. March and October are historically the most geomagnetically active months of the year.

Screen shot from my eBook. March and October are historically the most geomagnetically active months of the year.


Aurora science how to read and understand forecast data.

Aurora science how to read and understand forecast data.

If you are checking aurora forecast websites, keep in mind that low index ratings can still be very acceptable for photography, particularly in the northern regions. So actually, your location may be more critical than the intensity of the aurora display. Below are a few links to aurora activity prediction and forecast sites:

  • UAF Geophysical Institute Offers Alaska-based auroral display predictions both in a long and short term context. Since there are many variables effecting whether or not the aurora will actually be visible, these predictions are generalized, in particular, the long term forecast.

    Band represents range and extent of aurora borealis visibility in the AK. The graph is not a current prediction, click to check current status.

  • NOAA’s POES website (Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite) offers a general, and fairly simple circumpolar pictorial representation of the current location of the auroral oval, which is updated every ten minutes.

    POES website

    POES website: Aurora activity approximated in color bar representation. This image is updated every 10 minutes. See date stamp in graphic.


I’ve photographed the aurora during all stages of the moon’s presence.

  • A snowy landscape that reflects the light is a big help on a completely dark night. It can provide the necessary light for a foreground landscape that contributes composition to your frame.
  • Moonless nights offer opportunities for extended exposures enhancing star trails, and silhouetting mountains or trees behind a starry night. Additionally, very stable, or slow moving aurora make good opportunities for longer exposures as well. I have written about this subject in a previous post.
Comparison of two shots, one on full moon and one on a no moon night.

Comparison of two shots, one on full moon and one on a no moon night.


It is difficult to say what exactly is the best time of night to view the aurora. There are however some generalizations:

  • Between 10:00pm to 3:00am seems to be the time frame most conducive to aurora activity, so say the scientists and my experience confirms that.
  • Stay awake and be ready. I’ve never had much luck by going to sleep and then checking periodically. By the time you actually get dressed and get all the camera gear ready, the show can easily be over.
  • Plan to spend a chunk of time viewing. The aurora displays and activity follows a somewhat predictable pattern. Whether it is a homogenous arc, a rayed arc, or a corona, they present different types of photo opportunities, at different times of the night.
  • Scout your location in daylight and thus be ready. Displays can vary in duration, sometimes hours, sometimes only minutes. Be prepared when the action happens.
  • Remember, it varies widely. I try to get out as early in the night as possible with hopes of catching a little bit of the fading dusk light (and it does not take much) since it offers some wonderful blue colors in the sky.


This is what happens to a normally pliable shutter release cord in minus 40 degrees below zero. One need not photograph the aurora in such cold temps, but be advised that all things rubber and vinyl become very rigid. © Hugh Rose

Because aurora viewing is best in polar regions, you are likely to be in cold weather, and sometimes, very cold weather especially if you are coming to Alaska in the winter. If the thought of cold weather freaks you out, consider a time like late September or early April, when temperatures are a little warmer, but the skies are still dark at night. Getting yourself dressed properly and outfitted with the necessary equipment will greatly increase both your efficiency and enjoyment while spending a night photographing the aurora. Below are a few suggestions to help prepare you:

  • Good winter boots are critical. Make sure they do not fit tight. They should have a substantial base depth to them since you are often standing on cold ground in one place for long periods.
  • A pair of wool insoles inside the bottom of the boot add additional insulation, especially since one ends up standing and waiting for long periods.
  • First layer clothing: This is important! Do NOT wear cotton as the first layer against your skin. Use either polypropylene, fleece, or a soft Merino wool.
  • A warm parka: The conventional wisdom of “layering” is not so true when you are just standing around in very cold temperatures. Layering is great if your heat output varies frequently as when climbing and hiking. But loft and air are what really insulate against the cold, so a puffy down parka will do the job great with a sweater underneath.
  • Glove liners that can fit inside larger warmer mittens work well.
  • Small chemically activated hand warmers are a big help. I put them either in the pockets of my down parka, or in the mittens themselves.

Screen shot from my eBook. How to prepare and dress for the cold.


I photograph with Canon cameras, Currently the 5D Mark III, which is an outstanding high ISO performing camera. Canon’s other digital SLR’s are excellent options as well. Nikon has a strong lineup. I dedicate and entire chapter to this in my eBook, discussing DSLRs, both full frame and cropped sensors, Mirroless Cameras, and Micro four thirds models.


When photographing the aurora, high ISO capability is critical. For a good read on the importance of this over megapixels check out this article at Gizmodo: Why ISO is the New Megapixels. The upper end of today’s digital cameras have excellent  in-camera noise reduction.

  • If you are shooting .JPG files (which you really don’t want to do) you will want both Long Exposure and High ISO Noise Reduction turned on.
  • If you are shooting RAW, you only need Long Exposure Noise Reduction turned on (This can be turned off in the Canon 5D III model, and some other camera’s as well).

There is some debate on the need for Long Exposure Noise Reduction due to the cold temperatures in which aurora photography takes place. Since noise is a function of a heated sensor, cold temps can prevent the heated sensor. I advise that you test your camera first, should you chose to turn this setting off.

Screen capture from my eBook


While it is not impossible to photograph the aurora with a little point and shoot digital camera, it is challenging indeed and I don’t recommend it. The models are constantly changing, and perhaps in the near future it will become easier.


A tripod is absolutely essential for northern lights photography. A tall tripod will be more comfortable, as you will be aiming the camera up towards the sky. Squatting under a short tripod cranking your neck can become very uncomfortable, very fast. (NOTE: A GOOD BALLHEAD AND TRIPOD IS REALLY IMPORTANT, ON OUR PHOTO TOURS WE HAVE HAD MANY FRUSTRATED GUESTS WHOSE SMALL TRIPOD AND FLIMSY BALLHEAD EITHER BROKE OR OPERATED SO POORLY THEY MISSED MANY PHOTO OPPORTUNITIES. A GOOD TRIPOD IS WORTH IT.) Sorry for yelling at you in all caps, but you get my point….

  • This Bogen 055XB tripod, although on the shorter side, is an adequate inexpensive tripod available at B&H Photo. It even has built in leg warmers to protect your hands from cold metal.
  • The GT3541 is an exceptional, and expensive, tripod from Gitzo. It is lightweight and sturdy carbon fiber, and fairly tall. Notice it has no center column. If you get a tripod with a center column, the ability to remove it can be advantageous for close up photography. Additionally, one should not rely on expanding the center column completely for aurora photography, since this makes the camera less stable and susceptible to wind movement during long exposures.
  • Ballheads are preferred over pan/tilt heads.Kirk Enterprises makes the BH-3, is a great smaller ballhead.
  • Foam pads on your tripod legs will help keep your hands warmer


There are several desirable qualities to look for when considering lenses for aurora photography, As a general rule of thumb, you can pick any of the three:

  • Wide angle
  • Fast (large aperture of F/2.8 or wider)
  • Sharp
  • Minimal vignetting
  • Inexpensive

I have yet to discover the perfect lens, but here are two general ultra-wide-angle zooms that work well. Other lens manufacturers like Tamron, Tokina, Zeiss, etc., offer lenses available in mounts to fit Nikon, Canon, Sony, and other cameras and they have some outstanding options. I discuss this more thoroughly in my eBook:

  • Canon 16-35mm F/2.8 USM  Good optical performer, but not exceptionally fast. A bit expensive but versatile for both aurora and excellent for daytime general landscapes.
  • Nikon 14-24mm F/2.8 G ED Excellent quality, auto focus lens but loses that function when used on a Canon with a converter.
I dedicate an entire section on lenses, including which ones and why wide angles are preferred, along with recommendations for your camera model.

I dedicate an entire section on lenses, including which ones and why wide angles are preferred, along with recommendations for your camera model.


  • Batteries: Have a few batteries at your disposal. Keep on warm in a parka pocket.
  • Shutter Release: Prevents camera shake and allows for exposures in excess of 30 seconds. (Some wireless remotes only offer exposure options of 30 seconds. Make sure to check the version you have if you plan on using a wireless remote)
  • Chemical Hand warmers: I use them all the time. They can be kept inside an over mitt or in a pocket of your coat for a quick hand warming option.
  • Headlamp: A headlamp allows two hands to be free while handling your camera. Consider the on-off switch before purchasing, since you will be operating the headlamp with gloves on. This Brinkmann Focused Beam LED Headlamp is a good choice, and there are mnay others available on REI’s website.


Filters on a lens can cause concentric rings to appear in the center of an image (this is a crop) be sure to remove the filter when photographing the aurora.


When photographing the aurora it is important to remove the filter from your lens. Why? Look at the photo at right and you will see a series of concentric rings, which appear at the center of the image. This can be a disheartening discovery after a night of shooting the aurora, since the rings are very difficult to remove, with even the best photoshop geek on the job. What causes the rings? Charles Deehr, a professor emeritus in physics at the University of Alaska Geophysical Institute has been quoted by Dick Hutchinson as saying:

“These are interference fringes due to the parallel faces of the filter and to the narrow spectral emission at 5577 Angstroms in the aurora. That green, atomic oxygen emission line is the strongest emission in the aurora near our film and eye peak sensitivity, so it shows up first when there is any device in the optical path which sorts out the spectral emissions.”

This whole subject is extremely important.

This whole subject is extremely important!!


Pre-focusing your lens: Don’t overlook this important step. I have found this to be the biggest problem with photographing the aurora. With the new genre of autofocus cameras and lenses, there is tolerance built into the lenses to accommodate for changes in temperature. For this reason, you can’t just manually turn the focus dial to infinity and be confident that it will be in sharp focus. The old manual lenses did this perfectly, but the new ones don’t. (a few manual focus lenses still work this way, like the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8).

Using Auto focus before it gets dark:

  • Before it gets dark, focus your camera on a distant “infinity” focal point, like a mountain horizon.

Using Live View to focus:

In my experience, pre-focusing has worked excellent for all lenses except the Canon Canon 24mm 1.4L. For this lens, I’ve switched to using the live-view function (if your camera has it–most DSLR’s have it). Achieving focus and using live view is discussed in depth in my ebook-it can be more challenging than you might think.

  • Find a bright object in the sky (not the moon) and center your camera on it by looking through the viewfinder.
  • Turn on live view and maximum zoom in on the object and adjust until sharp.


  • San Disk is a flash card manufacturer with a line of cards called “Extreme” which are made especially for extreme temperatures. My experience with these cards has been good.
  • Camera batteries: it is a good idea to have at least two, three is better.
    • Keep one in your pocket, or in a nearby warm place. Switching them out occasionally will keep you powered up.
    • Long exposures tend to chew up batteries quickly.
  • When waiting on a chilly night for the aurora, I remove the flash card and battery and put them in my pocket. When the action happens, I quickly put them back in the camera and start shooting.


There is a whole lot to say about exposing for the aurora, so I expanded this section considerably with examples.

The digital age has taken much of the exposure mystery out of aurora photography, however, there are some specific issues to be aware of.

Snow loaded spruce trees and aurora with a slightly backlit sky from a low angle moon. © Patrick J. Endres


  • Read your histogram: The preview on the back of your camera is a good reference, but an LDC monitor on a dark night can fool you by making things appear brighter than they are. Michael Reichmann of has written an article on how to read a histogram: Understanding Histograms. I strongly recommend reading through it.


  • Proper Exposure is critical: Even though a RAW file offers latitude for exposure compensation, accurate exposure is imperative, especially when shooting high ISO.
  • Shoot in RAW format: If you are uncomfortable with RAW, shoot in RAW&JPEG format (if your camera permits it). Even if you don’t know how to process a RAW file, don’t worry. Someday you will be glad you did. Consider the RAW file like a negative. It will always be there and you can process it at any time.

Corona display with the big dipper, Fairbanks, Alaska. © Patrick J. Endres


There are two in-camera settings that many digital cameras have that can control noise in a digital file. I recommend visiting the article from Canon’s website if you would like to learn more on this subject:

High ISO Noise Reduction

Paragraph on Long Exposure Noise Reduction: With long exposure noise reduction (LENR) turned on or set to auto, all long exposures (over 1 second on the Canon 5D Mark III) are followed by a second additional frame with the shutter closed.  The in camera software compares the two and subtracts the noise and saves that image. It will slow down the LCD preview process but you can still keep shooting.

High ISO Noise Reduction:

  • If you are shooting in RAW format, you can ignore this in-camera setting as the noise reduction takes place in the post production process: As Canon States:

Long Exposure Noise Reduction:

  • It is preferred to have this turned off, but it should be turned on unless you have tested your camera before hand with it turned off and are satisfied with the quality.

“Some users wonder why this noise reduction feature isn’t always ON at all times. The answer is that using it can slow down your shooting of one picture after another. Here’s why: to do its job, Long Exposure Noise Reduction has to re-energize your imaging sensor and in effect take a “blank” exposure, after your actual picture is taken, for the same length of time. During this time, you cannot shoot another actual picture — the red card busy light on the back of the camera stays on until the process is completed. If you shoot, for example, a 30 second exposure, the camera has to be tied-up for an additional 30 full seconds before your next picture can be taken.”


If there is a great variation in the intensity of the auroral displays, and you have a fast lens, you can shoot in Aperture Priority mode, otherwise bulb or manual mode is required. I shoot both in AV and manual modes, depending on the circumstances and lens choice. As you get familiar with judging the intensity of the aurora, you can make pretty good guesses on exposure times. Remember your histogram!

  • Set your camera to Aperture priority mode.
  • Set your lens f/stop at its largest opening.
  • In general, a slight overexposure tends to be helpful when doing this, perhaps +1 to +1-1/2 of a stop. (This varies depending on your camera model)
  • Using Bulb mode: If your exposure exceeds the in-camera timer of 30 seconds, switch your camera to Bulb mode. Plug in your cable release (Some cameras have built in intervalometers) Your exposure will go as long as you hold the release button down. Be aware of the helpful clock that counts in seconds on the top LCD panel when shooting in bulb mode.


There are a number of programs for making modifications and corrections to raw files:

In these programs you will find the necessary tools to address white balance, color saturation and tonality, noise reduction, shadow and highlight control, etc. The question of shooting a raw file over of .jpeg file will be immediately answered at this point!

This subject is addressed in a basic format in my eBook, with illustrations about what a histogram should should look like, and other exposure related details.

Screen shot from my eBook on what to do in the field.

New section on working in the dark, and other very important issues. This is a critical chapter.


  • Shoot in RAW format
  • Set LCD Brightness to low
  • Remove the filter from your lens
  • Pre focus your lens on infinity or use live-view with loupe
  • Test exposure, consult histogram
  • Have 2 batteries and 2 flash cards
  • Use a tall but sturdy tripod
  • Check the aurora forecasts
  • Use your lens hood to protect against frost/condensation on your lens
  • Put black tape over your red processing light under the wheel (for Canon users-your fellow photographers will like you)

screen shot from my eBook on a few recommended apps.

I go over a much more thorough pre-flight and checklist in the eBook, along with a section on recommended Smartphone apps.And finally, good luck and have fun! Getting yourself in the right spot, with clear skies, good aurora activity, and smooth working gear can take a few attempts. Be patient and enjoy the night sky. You are likely to learn a few constellations in the process!

Please link back to this page when sharing. Thank you ~ Patrick

What Readers Say about my eBook

“I just wanted to take a moment to say Thank You for writing your book, “How to Photograph the Northern Lights”.   It had been a dream of mine to not only see but to photograph the Northern Lights since I saw a photo of them as a teenager… 40 years later it happened. I just returned from a trip to Fairbanks, and I read your book many times before leaving and then practiced everything I read before my trip. Your book successfully prepared me for everything from the weather to making sure I had the right camera, the right lens, the right settings, and how to make use of the Aurora Forecast data. Your book was my bible and made my dream a complete success. So, Thank You for making my dream a reality!”

Thank you and Best wishes, Kyle Moore

“I’m pretty sure you’ll not remember but I got in touch two years ago after buying your first edition, and you were kind enough to point me in the right direction for a handful of locations in and around Fairbanks to shoot the lights… Thank you for inspiring, for teaching and most of all for being so passionate about the aurora. I can completely understand where the passion comes from, speak non-stop about it to anyone who will ask, and am currently looking for a way to head north for at least a month next time ;).  It takes a good teacher to share the skills and understanding you have of both photography and the aurora, and to share it so openly is a credit to you.”

Thank you Patrick, Kind regards, Neil

  • Einar Páll Svavarsson - As I am preparing to spend some serious time this winter on taking Northern Light photos for my website, I found this tutorial extremely helpful. I have only done one experiment two nights ago and after reading this article I saved a considerable amount of time.September 25, 2015 – 9:58 amReplyCancel

  • Ben | Bakehouse - Thanks for this resource, very comprehensive. Have you had a chance to experiment with the new Lightroom dehaze tool – if so what are your findings, does it help with your night sky photography? (Seems a little heavy handed to me!)August 30, 2015 – 3:48 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Ben, I have done just a little work on some aurora photos with the dehaze tool. I need to experiment with it on a variation of files, but in general, it is a hammer so to speak. However, it does provide some help.August 30, 2015 – 8:21 amReplyCancel

  • photos - I intended to send you a very small observation to say thanks the moment again on the awesome thoughts you’ve featured in this article. It has been so shockingly generous with you to provide publicly what many individuals would’ve sold for an electronic book to end up making some bucks for themselves, particularly considering the fact that you could have tried it if you ever desired. The thoughts likewise served to become a fantastic way to know that other people have the identical zeal the same as mine to see a good deal more when considering this condition. I’m certain there are millions of more pleasant times in the future for individuals that read through your website.August 14, 2015 – 10:50 pmReplyCancel

  • Bekir Erdogan - some people think that we have to have a really expensive camera. some expensive education etc.. maybe you need a good camera but not essential. professional people takes perfect picture. some of them takes education for years. some of them like me find quick ways.August 10, 2015 – 2:49 amReplyCancel

  • Jon - I think nowday to buy camera you need to have alot of money. I mean not everyone can buy camere for $1,5000 ..

    But if we look at it like an investment.. I mean if i can earn with this camera..??July 9, 2015 – 8:02 amReplyCancel

  • Books to download – Edpen Books | Edrees Writes - […] Aurora Photography and guide — Northern Alberta Aurora tour — Video -Flight of […]June 13, 2015 – 6:05 pmReplyCancel

  • Serena Como - My 53 year old son rates this colour very alluring, friend.May 13, 2015 – 4:43 pmReplyCancel

  • Website - I have to get across my admiration for your generosity supporting persons who really want assistance with the area. Your very own dedication to getting the message all over has been extraordinarily functional and has in every case enabled ladies like me to reach their endeavors. Your new helpful publication signifies a great deal to me and far more to my colleagues. With thanks; from each one of us.May 11, 2015 – 10:34 pmReplyCancel

  • A beginner's guide to taking pictures of the northern lights - Tsepa - […] sure you at least get a picture of the event. There’s an incredibly detailed tutorial here by Patrick J Endres, but if you’re not an experienced photographer, or you just want it kept really simple, […]April 3, 2015 – 12:47 amReplyCancel

  • A beginner's quide to taking pictures of the northern lights - | Blog - […] sure you at least get a picture of the event. There’s an incredibly detailed tutorial here by Patrick J Endres, but if you’re not an experienced photographer, or you just want it kept really simple, […]March 30, 2015 – 1:24 pmReplyCancel

  • A beginner's quide to taking pictures of the northern lights - igo2fix - […] sure you at least get a picture of the event. There’s an incredibly detailed tutorial here by Patrick J Endres, but if you’re not an experienced photographer, or you just want it kept really simple, […]March 30, 2015 – 12:39 pmReplyCancel

  • How to photograph the Northern Lights - Big In Finland - […] main source of information for this article was wikitravel. And here you can find a very comprehensive guide if you already are an expert on digital […]March 11, 2015 – 1:35 amReplyCancel

  • harga tv led - Please try the new version now. This issue has been fixed now

    harga kameraMarch 6, 2015 – 6:29 pmReplyCancel

  • Bruce Clegg - Off to northern Finland next week. Good tip about removing the UV lens that I use for protection. Still in early days with a Nikon D750 after using Sony for several years but always shoot in RAW. I hope to get clear skies!February 20, 2015 – 1:55 pmReplyCancel

  • Navroop Sahdev - Thanks! Heading to Iceland in two days!February 9, 2015 – 7:51 amReplyCancel

  • Meagan Trevor - Seriously helpful elements you’ll have stated, thanks a lot for setting up.February 6, 2015 – 10:52 pmReplyCancel

  • Leeanne Coant - It really is mostly extremely difficult to see well-aware parties on this content, in addition you come across as like you be aware of whatever you’re covering! CheersJanuary 23, 2015 – 6:59 amReplyCancel

  • Więcej tu - Gone are the wood, leather and ornate fabrics, to be replaced by glass, chrome, metal and other materials. In general, contemporary furniture is made of man-made materials and synthetic fabrics, although some use natural materials. The actual characteristics of the contemporary style are various, defined less by material and more by the way the pieces look and “feel” in their surroundings.January 22, 2015 – 10:43 pmReplyCancel

  • Karla Kruse - Heading to Iceland in a couple months to look for the Lights!January 18, 2015 – 1:43 amReplyCancel

  • Sarika Shah - Thank you for all the great tips! Off to Iceland next week!December 12, 2014 – 4:08 pmReplyCancel

  • 5 предметов первой необходимости для путешествия по Исландии - […] Лучшим фотографом северного сияния считается Патрик Дж. Эндрес, который с удовольствие делится секретами как лично, […]November 22, 2014 – 2:52 amReplyCancel

  • Jody N Kelly Schindler - Thank you so much for your tips! Going Aurora hunting tonight, will be using your tips!November 9, 2014 – 4:39 amReplyCancel

  • 7 Facts about the Northern Lights - […] (it’s almost always cold when viewing an aurora) battery life drops rapidly. Here’s a very handy guide to photographing the Northern Lights which is well worth reading if you’re planning to take […]September 17, 2014 – 1:31 amReplyCancel

  • Aurora Borealis | Hati and Skoll Gallery - […] Well, I’d love to share with you an image that I took on Friday night.  But I have none.  I do want to mention however, that here is a case where digital photography with its increased sensitivity with reduced gain and immediate feedback offers an amazing advantage.  Still I would recommend studying up on just how to do it correctly. There is an excellent detailed resource on the web by Patrick J. Endres. […]September 14, 2014 – 4:52 amReplyCancel

  • Bert Hui - Found this as I’m about to go out in the Columbia River Gorge to hunt for it! Thanks for the tips!
    September 13, 2014 – 5:42 amReplyCancel

  • Kim 'Mandelin' Zaiman - Thanks! They are saying we’ve got a chance as far south as Minneapolis/St. Paul tonight.
    September 12, 2014 – 10:46 pmReplyCancel

  • Follow Christina's Camera - Thanks for the great tips! I hope to see the lights near Tacoma/Seattle tonight. Hopefully, one day, I’ll make it up to Alaska :)September 12, 2014 – 10:27 pmReplyCancel

  • Marianne Campolongo Photography - They say we might be able to see it tonight in NY State – Thanks for the tips on how to get the best photos. September 12, 2014 – 9:58 pmReplyCancel

  • Cheryl Hamer Lrps - excellent, thanks – giving it a whirl tonight!September 12, 2014 – 4:19 pmReplyCancel

  • Seth K. Hughes - Thank you for the thorough write up. Very helpful!September 10, 2014 – 10:16 pmReplyCancel

  • Ricardo Maldonado - Very good advises and recommendations for Northern Lights Photography. Thanks so muchSeptember 4, 2014 – 2:30 amReplyCancel

  • 4 Awesome Sky Events You Can See Without A Telescope - Here's When & Where To View Them! - Fun Times Guide - […] How To Photograph The Aurora Borealis […]August 21, 2014 – 1:01 pmReplyCancel

  • Sell Home Baltimore - I am continually looking online for articles that can help me. Thank you!August 2, 2014 – 11:57 pmReplyCancel

  • #conquerlapland: Aurora Borealis | - […] from up there. And if you want to find out more about how to take pictures of the Northern Lights, check out this site. That’s the one I read while my camera was charging. It was a bit harder than I expected. […]April 3, 2014 – 11:28 amReplyCancel

  • Cameron Algie - This book is fantastic. I purchased it 1 month before my trip Svalbard and it was a holiday saver. I used every bit of advice Patrick put in and ended up capturing some amazing sequences of dancing lights.
    The most important advice was on how to preset your camera and lens – I was out of the van and taking photos from the tripod in less than 2 minutes at one stop.March 15, 2014 – 7:19 pmReplyCancel

  • Chris Brown - I also set WB to sunny rather than auto.March 7, 2014 – 1:49 amReplyCancel

  • cameras in dubai - excellent guidance for new photographer its really usefulFebruary 25, 2014 – 3:53 amReplyCancel

  • Anonymous - […] […]February 23, 2014 – 1:27 pmReplyCancel

  • Let There Be Light! | A Billion Little Stars - […] And of course, you would definitely want to capture a precious memory of the Northern Lights. Alaska Photographics has an excellent article about what you should do and bring in order to capture the best, including a detailed checklist, which I have documented below for your benefit. Credit goes to them and if you want to find out more, click here. […]February 19, 2014 – 11:33 pmReplyCancel

  • Ben O'Leary Photography - Fantastic resource and great images, the book sounds great – do you also do workshops?February 12, 2014 – 9:56 amReplyCancel

  • Top 5 Tips to Find the Northern Lights in Iceland - Way Out Far | Way Out Far - […] would have wasted that time sodding about with equipment and not looking. There’s loads of really good tips for photographing the lights out there if you’re a shutter bug. If you’re not, then […]February 2, 2014 – 12:35 pmReplyCancel

  • Lisa James - This is an excellent insight into shooting such am amazing phenomenon !!November 11, 2013 – 1:43 pmReplyCancel

  • Malisa Murdaugh - I think what you’re doing here is pretty good. But there is a few problems with your argument and I think you should probably rethink it.November 6, 2013 – 5:48 amReplyCancel

  • alison - Thanks for the really useful info. I’m headed to Swedish Lapland in December and, from your article, it looks like my Sigma SD14 isn’t going to cut it — would that be a fair assessment? Should I look to borrow a camera from someone?October 28, 2013 – 1:27 amReplyCancel

    • al - Hi patrick
      I am going to fairbank in nov. I have canon t5i and pancake 40mm f2.8 and kut 18-55 f3.5 stm. Thinking about buying 28mm f1.8. Which of these lens do u think is best for shooting northern light. ThanksNovember 2, 2013 – 12:11 pmReplyCancel

  • Dana - Hi Patrick
    My apologies as I am extremely new to photography in general. I will be going to see the northern lights in Finland in 2 weeks. I want to take the best photos possible while on a limited budget. One department store recommended the Sony NEW-3N while another recommended the Samsung NX1000 (which I like because it seems more user friendly and I like its features such as the wireless uploading of photos). Which would you recommend? Your help would really be appreciated.
    Cheers , DanaOctober 20, 2013 – 3:20 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Dana,
      I’m not familiar with either of those cameras, Sorry about that, there are so many out there. In my Ebook I discuss the things to look for in a digital camera. You might want to reference that an see if these camera’s have the necessary settings.October 24, 2013 – 9:21 amReplyCancel

  • Beth - Hi , I’m about to go to Iceland and am still learning how to use my Nikon D3100. I’m on a budget and can’t really afford to by a wide angle Lens. I do have 18-55mm VR Lens the Lowest it goes F/3.5 is that any good? and how can I use it to the best advantage as I would Like to get some Good/ reasonable pics.September 28, 2013 – 11:27 amReplyCancel

  • Mr B K Dutta - Very helpful tips for me. I have been three times to different places (Norway & Sweeden) saw a lot but could not get a decent photo. I will try this Time in Finland ( 3,4,%th October ’13) & I hope following your tips i will be able to record some photos. Thanks.September 25, 2013 – 5:04 amReplyCancel

  • Cómo fotografiar la aurora boreal - Big In Finland - […] fuente información principal de este artículo ha sido wikitravel. Y aquí una guía muy completa (eng) si ya eres un experto en fotografía […]September 22, 2013 – 10:01 pmReplyCancel

  • gary michalczuk - Hi being new at this photography which I find very frustrating and also very rewarding .will be going to Iceland this November the only lens I have is a Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 would this be suitable or should I invest in a sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 or a tokina 11-16mm to photograph the northern lights……thank youSeptember 1, 2013 – 2:25 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Hi Gary,
      I discuss the reason’s surrounding lens choice in depth in my eBook. If you are traveling all the way to Iceland, I highly recommend the book as it will give you a lot to consider regarding the aurora. Your 16-50 should do o.k. as it is an f/2.8. A wider f/2.8 would be helpful, but not essential.September 2, 2013 – 8:54 amReplyCancel

  • Chris - Hi Patrick – I am going (1st time) to Iceland week of Thanksgiving to photograph Northern Lights.

    Hope for 11 year cycle peak!

    Still FILM – 120 medium format – • Mamiya AFD645 – will take off ALL filters, focus to infinity – Lens:
    80mm -f2.8 – 50mm (35 equivalent (8:5 ratio))
    55mm – f2.8 – 35mm (35 equivalent (8:5 ratio))
    35mm – f3.5 – 21.5mm (35 equivalent (8:5 ratio))

    2.8 – 25 seconds – 80mm and 55mm lens 20/25/30 (Bracket)
    3.5 – 35 seconds – 35mm lens – 30/35/40 (Bracket)
    using BULB Setting, lowest f-stop setting
    Tripod, trigger cable

    Any suggestions GREATLY APPRECIATED! Will be out many nights/all night! :)
    Many Thanks, ChrisAugust 22, 2013 – 11:08 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Chris,
      I would bracket by a greater amount than 5 seconds, since that is only 1/3-1/5 of a stop. It all depends on ambient light and the intensity of the aurora. Some of those judgments require experience. Just shoot a lot to cover your base. Such is the world of film. If you have not already read my ebook, I think you will find it well worth the money. And finally, If you can splurge, rent a canon 5D MarkIII and a zeiss 21mm f/2.8 just for fun, and take a few shots. You will be instantly converted. Good luck, let me know how it goes.August 24, 2013 – 12:40 pmReplyCancel

  • glomoufik pour toujours - Lifestyle factors can produce strong effect on breathing and
    tissue oxygenation. You may have a problem reading any kind of print in smaller fonts, too.
    The act is therefore unifying as it is there for all survivors.August 2, 2013 – 12:58 amReplyCancel

  • Daniel - Thanks for all the good tips Patrick, I’ll for sure check our your e-book.
    Do you have a preference between the
    Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Ultra Wide Angle Zoom Lens or Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM Ultra Wide Angle Zoom Lens for a Canon 60D SLR Camera for shooting the Auroa?

    At around $1600 price point do you recommend going with the Canon brand?July 31, 2013 – 9:37 pmReplyCancel

  • at home - I visited many blogs but the audio feature for audio songs present at this web page is
    really wonderful.July 31, 2013 – 7:30 pmReplyCancel

  • web site - I’ve read some good stuff here. Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much attempt you place to make this type of magnificent informative web site.July 30, 2013 – 10:36 pmReplyCancel

  • Tara - Thank you so much for this info – It’s always been a dream of mine to photograph the northern lights but I’ve always wondered how you would do that – are they really that bright??June 21, 2013 – 9:02 amReplyCancel

  • Ian Vallance - Wanting to photograph the northern lights with a Canon S5 IS, driven manually – will this work.
    CheersMay 8, 2013 – 7:02 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Ian, I’m not familiar with that camera. In my eBook I discuss what to look for in a digital camera if you want to shoot the aurora. You can check that against the what the camera offers.May 9, 2013 – 7:30 amReplyCancel

  • Gran time lapse de aurora boreal en Noruega - Encuentra tu Destino - […] a fotografiar la aurora boreal, como se puede ver en este libro (o buscar recursos gratis en […]April 26, 2013 – 12:13 amReplyCancel

  • Aurora borealis - […] digital SLR and a good lens and tripod, you are likely to get some very satisfactory images. This article is intended to give you some necessary information to help guide you in your northern lights […]March 5, 2013 – 7:02 amReplyCancel

    • Donna Marshall - Hi Patrick, I have a Cannon Rebel T3i with a Sigma DC 17-70mm lens. We are going up to the Arctic Circle in Sweden at the end of March. Any tips on using a camera like this? I am a bit of a novice, sad to say.March 16, 2013 – 11:57 amReplyCancel

      • Syed Tajgeer - Is there a any difference between iPad version and PDF version. If there is can you please explain thanks.Also if I down load a PDF version on my portable hard drive can I view with my desktop and PC when I am travelling?March 29, 2013 – 7:32 amReplyCancel

        • Patrick Endres - Syed, The content of the pdf and iBook are the same. The interface is different since the iBook version uses Apple’s iBook interface and navigation. The PDF is a standard file and can be viewed on any computer.March 29, 2013 – 9:00 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - TC,
    I’ve discussed this in my eBook, with further comments on the subject. I would only use wireless if I needed to, that it, wanting to trigger the shutter from far away. Simple is best.March 4, 2013 – 7:47 amReplyCancel

  • TC - I am heading to Iceland in a week with my D600. I’m looking into what shutter release to bring with me and trying to figure out if there is a recommendation of wireless vs. wired.

    Given it might be cold (sub-30 degrees), I wonder if the wireless remote is a mistake given battery life? The wired remote should be OK for that, but has the disadvantage of being connected to the camera which could introduce camera shake.

    Would love a recommendation!March 3, 2013 – 9:10 pmReplyCancel

  • Diana - I LOVE THE BOOK! I downloaded it on my iPad and read it in one night. Am taking it with me next week to Alaska where I am sure I will refer to it time and time again. Thank you Patrick. My only suggestion for future editions would be to make it easier to navigate.March 1, 2013 – 1:09 pmReplyCancel

  • paul wain - Hi, is the book likely to be available on amazon kindle?March 1, 2013 – 12:33 pmReplyCancel

  • Ceri - Thank you so much for all this information. It’s been so important in preparing myself for the journey I’m about to go on. Both myself and my partner are going to Northern Finland and Norway in three weeks time.

    We’re going out with the Aurora Hunters who, like you, train people to take photographs of the Northern Lights. Then we’re going on an eight day husky trip. We’re soooooo excited. A trip of a life time.

    We’re doing a blog as we go and uploading photos and a diary:

    Again, I want to thank you.February 20, 2013 – 9:14 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Kim, glad to hear the successful report.February 13, 2013 – 7:57 amReplyCancel

  • Kim C. - Great article! We followed your advice and got AMAZING photos on Feb. 10 in Yellowknife. Used a Canon Rebel TXi and Canon Super Wide Angle EF 20mm f/2.8 USM. We shot in Manual mode at 1600 and 800 ISO with exposures between 20 and 30 seconds. Seemed like no matter what we did, we couldn’t get a bad shot.February 12, 2013 – 1:18 pmReplyCancel

  • Rahul - Thanks for all the help. I am heading to Coldfoot in late March. Do you think getting dedicated winter shoes are needed for that time? Additionally, is there a lot higher probability of catching the aurora at Coldfoot compared to Fairbanks?February 7, 2013 – 8:51 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Rahul,
      You want a good winter boots with thick sidewalls and sole depth, that provides sufficient insulation. It can get very cold in March.February 11, 2013 – 9:00 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Beth, I would strongly recommend getting a wider lens in the f/2.8 category. The 14mm would be slightly wider, the 16-35 would give you more versatility.February 6, 2013 – 11:04 amReplyCancel

  • Beth - I am going to be shooting the lights in 3 days and unsure what are my best options for lenses. I will be using Canon 7D, I own Canon 10-22mm and 17-55mm, but I am considering renting the Canon 14mm 2.8L II or the 16-35mm.February 5, 2013 – 6:16 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Diana,
    I’m not familiar with that equation, however, if true, it sounds like there is a corrective calculation based on latitude. I shoot almost exclusively from 64-68 degrees north, under the auroral belt. At that location, isolating the stars (the meaning of that varies among individuals) is usually around 15 seconds for a 16-20 mm lens. The good news is, it is easy to test. Take a shot and zoom in on the stars until you find an acceptable star-trail free shutter speed. You can even test this before there is any aurora action. Once you know the time for one lens, you can extrapolate that to you other lenses as well. Good luck.January 26, 2013 – 11:17 amReplyCancel

  • Diana P. - Patrick: Can you enlighten me about the 1000 to 100 guideline for photographing stars? I’m told that to get sharp photos of stars one should use a shutter speed in seconds that is no longer than the focal length you’re using divided into 100 if you’re at the equator or 1000 if you’re at the pole. Do you use this guideline and can you tell me what number I should use to divide my focal length into at Chena Springs?January 24, 2013 – 12:50 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Thanks Mike, glad it was a successful venture.January 21, 2013 – 7:28 amReplyCancel

  • Mike Weathers - Patrick,
    Thank you for the tips. Upon my return home from my deployment I have accomplished getting some great shots of the northern lights. I am now seeking better areas to photograph them in to get better foregrounds in the scenes as well. As I haven’t had the opportunity to travel around as much as I would like I am hoping to get out and about more. I hope your travels have proven to be very photogenic for you.
    MikeJanuary 20, 2013 – 2:02 pmReplyCancel

  • Phil - Thanks

    PhilJanuary 19, 2013 – 12:08 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Phil,
    I use the Kirk BH-3 for aurora. 19, 2013 – 12:05 pmReplyCancel

  • Phil - Thank you.

    I do have collar mount for that lens – you find that you can adjust the camera without it being top heavy and difficult to adjust with a long lens? What ballhead do you use? I’ve been looking at the Manfrotto Q5 054.January 19, 2013 – 12:02 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Phil,
    I use ballheads exclusively. From wide angle to 500mm, they are excellent. I presume you have a tripod collar mount for your 70-200?January 19, 2013 – 11:46 amReplyCancel

  • Phil - Thanks Patrick

    I use a Canon 70-200mm f2.8 lens quite a bit – could be tricky on a ballhead? Mind you they seem to be able to take more weight than the geared ones but might be hard to use with a heavy lens?January 19, 2013 – 11:43 amReplyCancel

  • Phil - Oh, and what do you reckon to Black Magic’s Magic Lantern firmware for the 5D? – I’ve heard great things about it but they don’t have a tried and trusted release for the MKIII yet – seems like it might still be a bit of a risk. But some real benefits.January 17, 2013 – 4:20 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Phil,
      I have not used the magic lantern firmware so I can’t comment on it. I’ll be checking into it to see if there is any merit for aurora shootingJanuary 19, 2013 – 10:56 amReplyCancel

  • Phil - Great article Patrick – really thorough. Tried to make a contribution by PayPal but I didn’t have your email address. Will do when you let me know. The PayPal donate button just took me to my PayPal account.

    I am off on an Aurora shoot in northern Norway for first two weeks of Feb. I’ll have a 5D MKIII with Canon 24mm f1.4 and Nikon 14-24 f2.8. I have several other lenses but these are probably the key ones I’ll use for the aurora. I’ll shoot everything raw including time-lapse which I will do on a motion control slider. I’ll also shoot video.

    Main questions are whether to use a ballhead such as Manfrotto MH054M0-Q5 or maybe a Manfrotto Junior Geared Head. I currently have a video fluid head MVH502AH which is a bit overkill and bulky. I am concerned that a ballhead might be tricky to operate with the weight of a long lens so the geared one might be a better option. Any advice on that?

    Also with noise reduction. I understand that when shooting raw I can just ignore the High ISO Speed reduction which set on in camera as default. And I should set long exposure NR to on?

    What do you reckon is the highest ISO I should shoot at to keep grain under control and potentially be able to blow up timelapse to 4K video?

    All the best

    PhilJanuary 17, 2013 – 4:18 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Phil,
      Ballheads are easy to use with smaller lenses, no geared option is necessary. As for Noise reduction, you can turn off both High ISO (which is for jpeg only) and Long exposure noise reduction is not needed with the canon 5d Mark III according to my tests. Good luckJanuary 19, 2013 – 10:59 amReplyCancel

  • Andy - Hi Patrick,
    I was wondering if you could provide/add an example of a histogram to your tutorial. I have read the article on but an example of an actual histogram would help understand it even more. Thank you for sharing your experience with us. Cheers, AndyJanuary 8, 2013 – 5:44 amReplyCancel

  • Rodrigo - Hi Patrick
    I am just wondering if you have looked at Canon 6D? It seems like it is much sensitive, and it has very low noise even compared with 5D Mark III. I am just thinking to either get that camera or replace my Canon 17-40mm F4 with the 15-35mm F2.8. What would you recommend?
    Thank youDecember 31, 2012 – 10:18 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Hi Rodrigo,
      I have not tested the Canon 6D so I can’t comment on that. If you are wanting to shoot aurora, I strongly suggesting going with that 16-35 f/2.8 as opposed to the f/4.January 19, 2013 – 11:08 amReplyCancel

  • Noud de Wolf - Hallo,
    Thank you for all the info.
    I’m happy with it and feel better prepaired for my pfoto
    shoot of the aurora next february in Lapland Sweden.
    At home I tried all the settings on my eos 7d to become familiar to do all these things in the dark to shoot the aurora.
    I found out that I can use the Canon RC-1 wireless remote
    for all the settings, also bulb mode longer than 30 sec.
    So for them who has one, you need not to buy an other release.
    Except perhaps for the sec. counter on your camera.
    Greetings from Noud.December 30, 2012 – 4:36 amReplyCancel

  • Amanda - Your site is very information. I had planned to go aurora shooting with a p&s camera. Now I realise that it is an uphill task so I intend to get a DSLR camera. As I have not used one before I have to learn quickly within 2 months.

    Will you recommend Canon EOS650C with S18-55mm (f3.5) lens or Nikon D5200 with 18-55mm (f3.5) lens?

    I realise from the comment postings that the aperture must be 2.8 or lower, however the lens in this category are beyond my budget. Any recommendations for lens compatible with the Canon/Nikon that is less than $500 and able to capture the aurora?December 24, 2012 – 10:35 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Hi Amanda, sorry for a delayed response. I’ve been traveling. You might try the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, it runs just a bit over $500 but is your only really good ultra wide option with that camera system.January 19, 2013 – 11:11 amReplyCancel

  • David - thanks a lotDecember 16, 2012 – 4:38 pmReplyCancel

  • David - Sorry for wrong type, Sigma lens is 20mm f/1.8December 16, 2012 – 1:09 amReplyCancel

  • David - Hello Patrick,

    Thanks for mass helpful information here. I’ll have a trip to Alaska around end of JAN/2013, a wide lens now I have is Canon 10~20 f/3.5, it seems not enough to take better aurora photos, so I’m considering to buy a new one : 1. Tokina 11~16mm f/2.8(wider) and Sigma 29mm f/1.8(faster) , may I know your suggestion?

    David from TaiwanDecember 16, 2012 – 1:07 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - David, If you can only get one, I would go with the 11-16mm for its wide angle versatility. I think you will gain more in the ultra wide than you would with the speed.December 16, 2012 – 12:39 pmReplyCancel

  • Sandy - Hi,

    I’m off to see the northern lights in Norway on Saturday. I’m taking a Nikon D3100 with the standard 18-55mm VR Lens, and also a DX 35 mm f1.8 lens that I bought as an extra.

    I am completely new to DSLRs, and I was wondering about the problem of taking night time shots (10 pm – 2 pm is the recommended time frame) from a cruise ship. Often I get an error message saying “Subject too dark” or that flash is required, or that the image is overexposed or underexposed (the exposure meter). Do you have any tips for dealing with these?

    A funny problem with the DX 35 mm lens is that Live View does not seem to work. The LCD monitor just goes blank when I try to rotate the Lv dial to change to Live View.

    Thanks a lot for any advice. SandyDecember 13, 2012 – 1:13 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Sandy,
      I’m writing on book on this topic now, as there is much to say. Basically, you want at least an f/2.8 lens in the DX range of 24mm. You cant shoot from a moving ship, a stable tripod is necessary on firm ground, set your camera to manual mode and try a 15-30 second exposure and adjust. Not sure what is happening with live view, that seems odd. I know canon gear best. I wish you luck.December 14, 2012 – 8:08 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Bruce,
    Yes, those are both good suggestions. Although I recommend a ball head for the tripod that has a very easy to operate quick release capability.December 12, 2012 – 9:35 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Martin,
    The 5D2 or the 6D would both be fine. As for a lens, it depends what you intend to do. I like the 16-35 2.8 for its ultra wide range and versatility in both daytime and night time use.December 12, 2012 – 9:34 amReplyCancel

  • Bruce Wenner - Thanks for the excellent article and for going “beyond the camera” in discussing shooting the Northern Lights. Shooting in such climes presents unique challenges and it’s good to see you are addressing those as well! Alaska is the only state I’ve yet to visit, so I’m looking forward to getting up there and putting your advice into practice some day!

    Here are a couple of tips I’d like to add:

    1. You mentioned insulating metal tripod legs. A good choice for this is the tubular pipe insulation available from any building supply store. These have a slit slong the side that even allows their use on tripods with central leg supports.

    2. For cameras where battery and/or memory card access is retricted when mounted on a tripod, a tripod ring adapter can sometimes be fitted around the camera lens or lens mount for mounting the camera rather than using its sole plate tripod mount.December 11, 2012 – 8:08 amReplyCancel

  • Martin Goss - Hi Patrick, to follow up my previous query after a bit more investigation, I’d possibly be able to stretch to a 5D Mark II – in which case what lens would you recommend? Cheers, MartinDecember 11, 2012 – 6:59 amReplyCancel

  • Martin Goss - Hi Patrick,

    This is an incredible article and forum discussion (that I have to admit I’ve struggled to fully process as it gets closer to 2am).

    I have been looking into getting a camera and lens set to capture the Northern Lights from Tromso in a month’s time and had no idea what I needed. The Canon 5d Mark III is more than twice the cost I was planning to spend and I was wondering whether you would have any suggestion for a more budget camera and lens combination that could do a good job (as compared to the great job for the Mark III)?

    I was also planning to take both stills and video – is the latter too optimistic?


    MartinDecember 11, 2012 – 6:08 amReplyCancel

  • Tim Fisher - If I may: Sasa. You need to experiment with setting before Tromso!
    You will find that focusing in the dark at infinity is achieved by rotating the lens barrel all the way around “to infinity and beyond”, then back a bit.
    You can see this clearly on the lens barrel on any day ‘cept a no-moonstate night, so make a note as to where the infinity focus really is on the guide on the lens barrel. This is in both M and ft. Plus the infinity sign.

    Likely it’s bang in the middle of this figure of infinity symbol, which is a number 8 (lying on its back)-ish!

    It’s worth doing some tests, even in the day light (!) as to how accurate this barrel guide is at say 15ft, 3ft etc. Very I’d say, but it’s the infinity focus you need to pay attention to for dark nights of little light with mtns on the horizon.

    Tip: have a low powered (tiny) torch to hand so you can check settings yourself on the lens barrel at night should the need arise.

    Tip: keep your best eye closed when using torches.

    Tip: then close the eye piece shutter curtain. The button is to the L of the eye piece; 6pm is open, 8pm is closed.December 9, 2012 – 9:03 amReplyCancel

  • Sasa Popovic - Hi Patrick,

    I am travelling to Tormso, Norway, end of March 2013. It will be first time to shoot aurora. Can’t wait for that… Would you be so kind as to comment on Nikon D800 settings for aurora shooting.

    One problem I had before – manual focusing in dark surroundings: If I manually focus to infinity, pics are usually not sharp simply because infinity mark covers interval of possible focusing positions(Nion 14-24 2.8).


    Sasa PopovicDecember 9, 2012 – 6:00 amReplyCancel

  • Jonathan - Hello. I will go to Iceland in december and I hope I will be able to take some good pictures of the Auroras. But I’m afraid I don’t have an adequate lens for it.

    My equipment is Canon5D Mkii. 17-40 F4, 70-200 F2.8

    As you said that a faster lens is desiderable I’m seriously considering a 50mm F1.8 (cheap and fast) but I don’t know if 50mm is good enough in a full frame. Another option is probably to hire a lens before going.

    What do you suggest?

    Thank you very much for your help and for a so complete site.


    JonathanNovember 13, 2012 – 12:06 amReplyCancel

  • Diana - What is the title of the book and when do you expect it to be published? I’m going to Alaska in March and I’d like to pre-order it if it’s expected to be available.October 29, 2012 – 9:10 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Diana,
      If you sign up for my newsletter (on the home page of the blog in the right column) I will be sending a notification. It should be published this November as an E-book.October 29, 2012 – 9:47 amReplyCancel

  • Ina - Hi!,

    Thanks for all the info. We are travelling to Norway on the 8th of November and will take a boat trip for 6 days Tomso-Kirkenes and back in search of the Aurora (A 5 and 4 Kp is forecasted for the 9th and 10th!) I have a Nikon D90 and only have a 18-55, a 55-200 and a 18-105 lens and a 1.4 converter. Which one would be most appropiate to use… i went to look for a 14-24 but they are priced at about 3 500 dollar here in South Africa!!!
    Any pre-settings you would recommend on this Nikon for the Aurora? And thanks for the filter tip – I suppose it also refers to UV filters?

    Thanks again – and wish us luck encountering the Aurora!

    InaOctober 28, 2012 – 6:00 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Hi Ina,
      I’m currently working on a book that covers this in depth. It might be available before your trip. If not, you can glean what I have written in the article here. Basically, you want the fastest, widest lens you can get. An f/2.8 or faster/larger opening.October 29, 2012 – 8:53 amReplyCancel

  • Don Poggensee - Do you ever lead Aurora trips out of Fairbanks? I am looking at
    taking 4 total, photographers up to Fairbanks in late March 2013
    for a week of Northern lights.

    Don Poggensee/ Wind Rider Images
    174 Lakeview Drive
    Ida Grove, Iowa 51445-8088
    Images for Publications since 1979October 25, 2012 – 8:06 amReplyCancel

  • Northern Lights | Scott Swanson Photography - […] a quick read of this guide on how to photograph the aurora borealis, I was ready. Unfortunately the only tripod available was […]October 23, 2012 – 4:27 amReplyCancel

  • James - @Diana; I wouldn’t say the 7D isn’t okay, at that level it’s more about the lens imho.

    What I would say is the 50mm 1.8 is going to be no use on the crop sensor; you need something wider. The 17-55 is probably your best bet, and I’d venture you can get something on the 10-22 as well. I personally predominantly use a 30mm f1.4 sigma (60D).October 20, 2012 – 1:55 pmReplyCancel

  • Tim Fisher - Hi.
    Thought the UK visitors might like this.
    YOu can set up email and SMS alerts and view recent images from Autunm (not Fall!) on the UK Google map for the NL’s in the UK.October 20, 2012 – 1:44 pmReplyCancel

  • Diana - Hi Patrick: Thanks for all the wonderful information. I will be traveling to Chena Springs in March. My camera is a Canon 7D which I know is not the best for shooting the aurora, but I don’t have the $$ right now for a new camera. The lenses I have are 17-55mm 2.8, 50mm 1.8, and 10-22mm 3.5/4.5 I am thinking of renting a 14mm prime 2.8 lens for under $200 but don’t know if it will make that much of a difference. Would appreciate your advice. Thanks.October 20, 2012 – 1:18 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Diana,
      The 14mm prime may offer some nice compositions, but you would probably be quite happy with the 17mm. Simplicity is worth a lot on a dark night, the zoom of the 17-55 would be handy and versatile, although I’m not familiar with the quality of that lens when shot at f/2.8. Check the reviews. The 10-22 would be best, and you can get some use out of itat 10mm, but it is on the slow side.October 20, 2012 – 6:06 pmReplyCancel

  • Ananda Roy - Hi Patrick,

    Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation of photographing the Northern Lights. My wife and I are going on a Northern Lights tour to Fairbanks, Alaska in two weeks and your blog was a great source of information.

    Here is my question: I see that you have recommended the Nikon D800 as one of the better cameras to shoot the Northern Lights. I am considering buying it but the operating temperature for the camera is labeled as 0C – 40C, as per the Tech Specifications in the User Manual. However as I read the average temperatures at Fairbanks during our time of visit will be anywhere from the range of -10C to -20C, especially at night. So before I buy such an expensive camera, I want to make sure that it will withstand such extreme cold. If not do you use some special protection for the camera when shooting?

    Any suggestions will be of immense help!

    Warm regards,

    AnandaOctober 18, 2012 – 7:59 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Ananda,
      I would not be concerned about the temperature. All Canon and Nikons that I’m aware of, have never failed in the cold. I would add however, that in a recent evaluation last week of images taken with 800 and 1600 ISO on the Nikon D800, it did not compare with the clean files generated by the Canon 5D Mark III. The other Nikons may perform better at high ISO, but I was not overly impressed with the D8000 files, particularly in the shadows.October 20, 2012 – 6:02 pmReplyCancel

  • Duane Magoon - I appreciate your detailed explanation of how to photograph the aurora using a digital camera. If I understand this article, you are using the term “digital camera” to refer to a true DSLR camera, and not the point-and-shoot (P&S) variety, such as my Sony HX100V.

    I recently tried to capture the aurora using my Sony and had difficulty (as you might imagine). The P&S cameras do have settings similar to the DSLR’s, of course, but there must be limitations to what P&S camera sensors are able to pick up to be able to get the results you and your readers have. While I am able to capture the aurora with the 30-second exposure, the greens appear very blurry and the fainter greens appear as pixelated blotches in the final product. (I’m sure there are better photographic terms for this.)

    I’m curious if any P&S owners have had success with photographing aurora, or is the only way to truly capture them is to sink money into a better (albeit more expensive) DSLR?October 17, 2012 – 12:19 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Duane,
      There are so many point and shoot cameras that I can’t really address their ability to capture the aurora. I don’t use them, and the times I’ve tried to assist people who had them, the results were marginal. There may be however, one out there that can do the job. Perhaps another person who reviews this article can provide some insight for you.October 17, 2012 – 1:03 pmReplyCancel

  • Aurora Borealis | ChiGarden - […] probably give it a shot anyway, even without a tripod. This article has a lot of great tips about photographing the aurora – maybe someday I’ll get a […]October 15, 2012 – 10:11 pmReplyCancel

  • Rob - Thanks very much for this post. Photographing the Northern Lights is something that I never would have considered taking photos of. I always thought it would be something beyond my expertise. However, having read this article I now believe that it is not something beyond my capabilities.October 13, 2012 – 1:48 amReplyCancel

  • tfttf573 – Northern Lighty Things | Photography Tips from the Top Floor - […] Alaska Photography Blog on shooting northern lights […]October 10, 2012 – 4:54 pmReplyCancel

  • Melissa Rennie - Hi, I live in the Highlands of Scotland – the Isle of Skye. I have only ever seen the Northern Lights twice and then they appeared late last night. I ran in to get my Canon 650 but my photos just turned out to be horrid! I only photograph for fun but I was still annoyed! Having read your tips I am just so thankful for the information. I am confident that next time I try and photograph the beautiful skies your tips will help me bag a better shot. Thanks for sharing, I really appreciate it :0)October 9, 2012 – 6:31 amReplyCancel

  • Jaci - i I also have a camera here already. An Olympus E-620. Would that be suitable for taking shots of the northern lights?October 5, 2012 – 6:23 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Hi jaci, and others with specific camera questions.
      I’m not familiar with that camera but you want the ability to use a cable release, high ISO, and preferably a fast aperture of f/2.8, which is also the equivalent of a 35mm or less.October 5, 2012 – 3:43 pmReplyCancel

  • Jaci - Hi I also have a camera here already. An Olympus E-620. Would that be suitable for taking shots of the northern lights?October 5, 2012 – 6:22 amReplyCancel

  • Jaci - Hi,

    I am staying in Tromsø over January February 2013. A friend recommended this camera when I queried about something that could handle the Northern Lights. Canon Powershot GX1

    What are your thoughts? I haven’t shot for a while and I have to remind myself of the lingo and techniques. This camera has an f 2.8 to 3.5. Is 3.5 better or the opposite way? It’s also got up to 12,000 ISO. Will that be helpful for aurora shooting?

    I didn’t really want to spend too much money. What would your recommendation be and would it be wise to get insurance on the camera and gear?

    Because I’m traveling all over Europe I need something lightweight and easily hidden from potential thieves.

    I look forward to your feedback.

    JaciSeptember 28, 2012 – 2:21 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Good for you Tom!September 20, 2012 – 8:10 amReplyCancel

  • Tom Cawdron - We are on holiday at Saariselka in Northern Finland and came here specifically in the hope of seeing the Aurora. My wife found your site which she made sure I studied properly (and did not skim read) and last night I tried to photograph the display for the first time. I have a Canon 20D and I used a fully open 17-85 f4-5.6 lens. I shot at ISO 400; f4; on a 30 second timed exposure. I only had a lightweight tripod which I used unextended, the roof of the hire care making an excellent and solid platform. I did not use RAW – the file size is as high as the camera will go other than RAW.

    According to the Alaska Aurora site, activity level 2 only was expected but nonetheless the photos were really good. Level 3 is expected tonight and I am hoping for better – if the cloud stays away.

    Very many thanks Patrick. I could not have done this without your help.

    TomSeptember 19, 2012 – 10:21 pmReplyCancel

  • Jan - Hello,
    Thanks for so much and so good information. Maybe you can say something about a sort of dilemma. I can’t decide wich lens to buy for the northernlight photograpy. My choices are Zeiss 21 2.8 or Canon 24 1.4. I like the Canon because of the 1.4 but they say the 1.4 is pretty useless.So i thought if i must use the Canon at 2.8 to get good picture then i can maybe better buy the Zeiss that is 21 mm and perfect on 2.8. What is your opinion.
    Regards from HollandSeptember 8, 2012 – 11:04 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Jan,
      If you have a camera that can shoot quality high ISO, I would go with the 21mm Zeiss for overall quality.September 11, 2012 – 4:11 pmReplyCancel

  • Winter Wonderland – Iceland (Reykjavik)! « Gooly2012's Blog - […] but there are  a lot of good blogs that provides such information, such as Lapland In My Heart, Alaskan Photography Blog, […]September 1, 2012 – 1:04 pmReplyCancel

  • Anne Walker - thanks you so much for being so generous with your information. Do you conduct photo tours for the Auroras? Aslo, please put me on your mailing list. Thanks! AnneJuly 24, 2012 – 12:09 pmReplyCancel

  • SLOphoto1 - The Canon SX40 will NOT shoot the Aurora! The previous model – the SX30 – would, but Canon put a new childproof governor on the SX40 which limits all time-exposure shots longer than 1.3 seconds to ISO 100. And all Canon point-and-shoot cameras are limited to a 15-second maximum exposure. They have no bulb setting.

    I have been in a 9-month fight with Canon over this very issue since October 2011, because when I last went to Fairbanks in September 2011, I was actually able to shoot the Aurora with the smaller Canon SX130, and another brand equivalent of the SX30. There was no ISO limit on either of them (well, ISO 1600, which produced a lot of noise, but at least they did work for me.) When returned I purchased the SX40 in the hopes of repeating my Aurora shooting sometime next year, only to discover that Canon had – unannounced – put an ISO limit on the SX40!

    The Canon SX40 will not take long-exposure night shots because of that arbitrary, imposed ISO limit, whereas the previous model, the SX30, would. I produced a video on it on YouTube, for those who are interested.

    Best Wishes, SLOphoto1July 20, 2012 – 8:49 pmReplyCancel

  • Alaska Day 7 (下): 遇見幸福極光 (Fairbanks) « Once-in-a-Lifetime Trips 一生一次的旅行 - […] How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera (介紹很完整的文章) […]July 16, 2012 – 1:48 amReplyCancel

  • Alaska Day 7 (下): 遇見幸福極光 (Talkeetna – Fairbanks) « Once-in-a-Lifetime Trips 一生一次的旅行 - […] How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera (介紹很完整的文章) […]July 16, 2012 – 12:59 amReplyCancel

  • Jaime Casal - How often do you find yourself shooting exposures longer than 30 seconds? I’m trying to decide whether to get a basic remote shutter or an intervalometer where I can set it to as long as shutter I need.

    My fastest lens right now is a 16-50 f/2.8 so I “think” I should be ok with the in-camera options which allows up to 30 seconds and BULB mode of course.
    Shooting with Sony a700 and a77

    Thanks!July 9, 2012 – 10:55 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Jaime,
      It all depends on the strength of the aurora. Generally, with an f/2.8 lens you can be under 30 seconds. However, I often shoot longer exposures for star trail effect or other reasons. I have an intervolometer, but use the standard remote most often since it is easier to use in the dark.July 15, 2012 – 10:21 amReplyCancel

  • James - It looks like the SX40 has a fully manual mode so you’ve got a chance just set it up to the fastest aperture (probably 2.8 on a bridge) and hopefully it has a bulb or long 20-30s exposures. ISO is going to be the killer, the bridge sensors are pretty small often so you might not get much above the 400 mark.

    Give it some tests before hand (in a field or even down your street trying to avoid light sources) and see what you can get.

    Make sure the flash is turned off!June 2, 2012 – 7:26 amReplyCancel

  • Tony Poulter - I have just purchased a Canon SX40 Bridge camera.
    Will this be suitable for taking pictures of the Northern lights.June 2, 2012 – 5:16 amReplyCancel

  • Agnieszka - Hi Patrick,
    Good call – I did a couple of tests at home and it doesn’t seem to have as big an impact as I thought. So, hopefully after charging the battery fully, it will be OK. Can’t wait! Thank you for the suggestion and brilliant tips on this website!May 30, 2012 – 12:56 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Agnieszka,
    I’m not sure how much battery consumption would happen under bulb. It depends on the type of battery, and the temperature. You could experiment at home…start with a full charge and do some test bulb exposures.May 29, 2012 – 2:25 pmReplyCancel

  • Agnieszka - Hello,

    Very useful information, thank you! My question is: you mention the need for an extra battery. I’m going wild camping for 5 days and I won’t have any opportunity to charge my battery. It usually lasts a good few weeks of every-day holiday shooting – can you guestimate how much batter will shooting in the bulb setting take up? Thank you! AgnieszkaMay 29, 2012 – 5:42 amReplyCancel

  • Roberto Porto - Hi, i went last february to lapland with my nikons to make a time palse video.
    your information in this web page was really usefull. Thank you very muchMay 20, 2012 – 3:28 amReplyCancel

  • Julienne Bowser - An informative and well written article Patrick. I will be in Fairbanks, ( coming from Australia) in September 2012. Downloaded the app onto my Iphone and Ipad so now I’m set. If you are on the street in Fairbanks and you see two granny types and they have an Aussie accent, please stop and say G’day.May 5, 2012 – 1:47 pmReplyCancel

  • adrian - Best & most informative article on imaging the Aurora i have ever come across,thanks Patrick.April 26, 2012 – 3:47 amReplyCancel

  • Aurura digita | Fotogrint - […] How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera.Because the aurora are drawn to the earth’s magnetic poles, far northern & southern latitudes offer … […]April 22, 2012 – 3:24 pmReplyCancel

  • Arthur Fowler - Great Article Patrick & thakyou for all your helpful advice (best article on photographing Northern Lights)

    ArthurApril 12, 2012 – 4:00 amReplyCancel

  • 【纯美北极】追寻极光攻略与拍摄技巧分享 « :::Au Fil du Temps::: - […] 一片英文好文给大家参考(A very good article on how to shoot Northern lights in English, thanks to the author for sharing!) […]March 29, 2012 – 5:07 pmReplyCancel

  • Angie - Wow, I have been looking for information on how to photograph the aurora for awhile now, your site hits every point I wanted and answered every question in depth. I was born and raised in Fairbanks (Harding Lake), and have always wanted to dabble in Aurora photography, however I’m totally lost on where to start.
    I have a 5D Mark II with a 16-35, which I was sure would do the trick, but this your article sure saves a lot of experimentation time since I now know where to somewhat start. We do a lot of travelling to extremely rural areas via bush plane and I’ve seen some incredible displays of northern lights on those trips.
    Just wanted to say thanks for the info, I’ve book marked your site and will be sufficiently cyber stalking it I’m sure.March 21, 2012 – 9:53 amReplyCancel

  • Lena Mikaelsson - Thank you for a great tutorial! It’s the best out there in my opinion!
    I have put a link to this article on my blog, and would like to make sure it’s OK with you :)Please let me know if you disapprove.
    It’s been great help to me photographing the Northern Lights!
    Thanks!March 20, 2012 – 7:19 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Lena,
      No problem, go ahead and link. I’m glad you found it helpful.March 21, 2012 – 6:49 amReplyCancel

  • Aurora Borealis | - […] Fotokamera auf und begannen damit, Aufnahmen zu machen. Rasch mussten wir feststellen, dass es – wie im Internet oft beschrieben – leider für Amateure nicht so einfach ist, gute Bilder zu schiessen. Dennoch tüftelten wir mit […]March 12, 2012 – 11:11 amReplyCancel

  • Watch: Northern Lights dance over Pacific Northwest : Solar Company USA - […] if you can get away from city lights and find a place with a clear view of the northern horizon. This site has more tips on how to photograph the northern […]March 9, 2012 – 7:10 pmReplyCancel

  • Watch: Northern Lights dance over Pacific Northwest - My Blog - […] get divided from city lights and find a place with a transparent perspective of a northern horizon. This site has some-more tips on how to sketch a northern […]March 8, 2012 – 3:43 pmReplyCancel

  • Watch: Northern Lights dance over Puget Sound - My Blog - […] get divided from city lights and find a place with a transparent perspective of a northern horizon. This site has some-more tips on how to sketch a northern […]March 7, 2012 – 3:18 pmReplyCancel

  • Alex - Patrick! Thank you for your article! We are headed up to Lake of the Woods in northern Minnesota this weekend and I see that the northern lights forecast is good! I am excited to try to photograph them. It will be hopefully the first time in my life seeing them! Thank you for putting things in layman terms!March 6, 2012 – 8:46 amReplyCancel

  • kerry - @patrick thanks very much for your advice. had a great trip to Tromso last week. first night, pretty faint exhibition. but our last night was fantastic. all of your recommendations were spot on. I rented the nikkor 17-35mm 2.8 specifically for this trip. what a joy to use at night–perfect for the lights. didn’t have to use more than 20 or 30 seconds exposure. here are some of the shots: 3, 2012 – 7:55 amReplyCancel

  • Dayna - What Camera is BEST for these shots?March 3, 2012 – 5:59 amReplyCancel

  • Viking Savaşçılarının Işıldayan Ruhları: Kuzey Işıkları - […] iyi bir makine ve soğuğa dayanıklı ekipman gerektiriyor. Fotoğraf çekmeyi planlıyorsanız ekipman, ayarlar ve diğer püf noktalarını araştırmanızı […]March 1, 2012 – 9:07 amReplyCancel

  • Mika Kuitunen - Patrick, firstly about the intervalometer on Canon cameras: There is a firmware upgrade called Magic Lantern for at least Canon EOS 550/600D, 60D, 5DmkII. It doesn’t replace the original firmware but it adds a few useful features ont top of it such as an intervalometer, some focus assist tools and bulb ramping for time lapse shooting in changing light conditions.
    Secondly, thank you for the great guide. I am currently in Lapland myself and even though I consider myself pretty unexperienced in photography, I’ve already gotten a few fairly good pictures of the northern lights. This information helps a lot in getting it right.
    -MikaFebruary 28, 2012 – 5:13 amReplyCancel

  • La aurora boreal sobre un volcán: una imagen única e irrepetible | Escapadas / Viajes Iberia - […] sensibilidad, uso de trípode… hasta cómo vestirnos y mucho más. Si tenéis curiosidad seguid este enlace para ver el tutorial sobre cómo fotografiar la aurora boreal (está en […]February 23, 2012 – 9:24 amReplyCancel

  • tim - There are some specific web sites to check, one being Spaceweather, the Visit Tromso site and others. It’s snowed heavily these past few days, inc’ my last day and on my first day I walked up the mtn overlooking Tromso. No lights but clear. Then I drove East into Sweden, a mistake it seems. Have fun!February 22, 2012 – 11:10 pmReplyCancel

  • Kerry - @tim who dif you use as a guide in tromso? Was weather bad? We are heading there tonight for 4 daysvso fingers crossed!February 22, 2012 – 10:51 pmReplyCancel

  • tim - … and I spent a small fortune (a beer is $15+, youth hostels $70+) taking in Tromso, nil points, and then travelling East into Sweden and Finland for 6 days and nights to get… zero. Back today 22/02/02 with very little to show for camping in minus 20 including a trip up Abisko Mtn. Nil points. Hugely deflated; and poor.February 22, 2012 – 1:28 pmReplyCancel

  • Thomas Kepczyk - Hey just wanted to thankyou for all the great advice…I rented the Canon EOS 5D MKII and the Canon 24mm IIL F/1.4 lens with a good Ball type tripod…through a company called Lenspro to go and they sent it to me overnight. I went out to the Chena Hot springs and went up the hill and got awesome photos! I was not sure I wanted to invest that amount of money with out trying it out first and the rental was a great option. Thank you for making it possible for an “amateur” to take some great photos…..there were probably 30 others that went up to get photos….but I was the only one prepared (even though I was up from Texas) all thanks to you. I recommended your site to everyone up on the mountain and to friends who see these photos.February 19, 2012 – 7:20 pmReplyCancel

  • James - Just wondering why the recommendation to use a ballhead over a pan & tilt head here? I was going for the 324RC2 ball but a mate recommended the 804RC2 which does look to offer better control (and is £30 cheaper!)February 13, 2012 – 5:26 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - James,
      A ball head is:
      More versatile, smaller, easier to pack, easier to operate in cold weather, use full for both landscape and wildlife photography. Basically more versatile overall.February 13, 2012 – 1:58 pmReplyCancel

  • Don - Thx Tim and Patrick. I had read over the article and it made a lot of sense. Just wanted to make sure there wasn’t more to it than making sure the pattern jives with the scene.February 10, 2012 – 11:07 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Don,
    Per Tim’s comments (thanks for fielding that one Tim). It is a complex subject but read through the article on luminous landscape. Generally, since at night there is a lot of black, you will find the histogram naturally reflecting that by being to the left (the far left is 100% black). But push some into the mid tones area and you will find that it looks better on your computer.February 10, 2012 – 2:48 pmReplyCancel

  • Tim Fisher - Re: Histograms – there’s a Luminous link in the main body of the text which explains. In effect, you need ideally to keep all the digital “information” within the graph, remembering that white scenes typically need to be a tad over exposed and dark scenes need a tad under exposure as the camera is trying to make everything a happy 18% grey.
    Set your camera to Matrix or an all-over exposure reading and not spot metering BTW!

    As stated, make sure you understand the viewfinder as it appears very bright in isolation in the dark of night and will, in day light, have fooled you into believing the scene was correctly exposed (“it sure looked that way last night!”) – this is where the Histogram comes into its own at the time of exposure & thus confirms correct exposure.February 10, 2012 – 1:00 pmReplyCancel

  • Don - Great write-up. I have a question about adjustments based on histograms. Am in Norway now – a cruise starting tomorrow and hope to get some good pix. You say to adjust setting based on the histogram? Can you provide some details? For example, do you want most of the pixels towards the middle (e.g., a bell shaped curve or uniform?), and if over or underexposed, adjust aperture and/or exposure time to get such a pattern.February 10, 2012 – 12:33 pmReplyCancel

  • Debbie S - Patrick, thanks so much for your prompt reply. I truly appreciate your advice. I love night photography and especially love long exposures. But, I am guessing this will be a whole new ball game, especially if it is windy (i.e. the shorter the exposure I can get away with the better). Thanks again.February 10, 2012 – 10:20 amReplyCancel

  • Debbie S - Hello Patrick, first let me start by thanking you for sharing your knowledge and experience, and of course your magnificent photographs.

    I will be heading to Iceland later this month in hopes of photographing the northern lights. I have a Canon 7D and a 5D Mark II. My lenses include but are not limited to 8-15 Fisheye f/4 (which I suspect from what I’ve read on your blog is not the way to go); the EFS 10-22 (so 7D only); 16-35 f/2.8; 24-70 f/2.8; 50 f/1.4; 24-105 f/4; and the list goes on to include longer lenses that are not relevant to this topic. I also have 2 excellent tri-pods and ballheads, a wired trigger remote and a wireless trigger remote.

    My question is as follows: should I bring both cameras and two tripods? My husband isn’t knowledgeable about photography, but if I got him set up, he certainly can press a shutter release. If you think 2 cameras aren’t necessary, which one would you take with you and why? The 7D is faster at 8 fps vs. 3.9 for the 5D, and I find the focusing mechanism to be faster and more precise on the 7D bc of the 19-point focusing system. Then again, if I am spot focusing, it may not matter. The 5D is full frame so I wouldn’t give up focal length from the 1.6 factor of the 7D. Pluses and minuses in both columns (which is why I have both cameras). Of course it would be easier to lug less gear, but I have all the proper carrying equipment, and we will be driven by a guide who is a local professional photographer in a large 4×4 vehicle. That said, if it were you, what equipment would you bring with you (we live in the US)?

    Any advice you might be willing to share would be most appreciated. Thanks in advance, and happy shooting. :)February 10, 2012 – 5:07 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Debbie,
      For aurora, I would use the 5D and the 16-35mm and possibly the 24-70. Running two cameras can be more complex than it seems, although possible. You may want the 7D for other photography, but the 5D wins easily for aurora.February 10, 2012 – 7:12 amReplyCancel

  • Tim Fisher - Hi.
    Good info and I’m up to Norway / Sweden / Finland 16th Feb’ for a week.
    I wanted to add that there’s some interesting info’ regarding the longer timed shots with Nikons re: Interval timer shooting (intervalometer) and also Time Lapse.
    For the latter: “1.) Turn off every auto anything, including auto contrast and auto saturation. If you don’t, your sequences will flicker from the auto WB or auto sharpening or auto anything from frame-to-frame. ”

    For the Nikon’s intervalometer and using multi shots over a long period, turn off the LCD review.!
    “The D700 / D3 does more than a regular intervalometer & lets you shoot one shot at each interval, or a burst of them. The default interval is a minute and can be set from one second to many hours.
    TimFebruary 8, 2012 – 2:31 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Tim, Some good points to consider for the Nikon shooters. I wish Canon had a built in intervalometer!February 10, 2012 – 7:11 amReplyCancel

  • Alan D - Hi Patrick – I can only echo all the other comments about your great website and willingness to share your experiences with all of us would be northern light photographers!

    I am going to Finnish Lapland at the beginning of March and keeping my fingers crossed for a sighting and hopefully some photos using your tips.

    I have a Canon 7D with the 10-22 f/3.5 – 4.5 USM lens which I hope will be a suitable combination. However, one question I have is about battery life. Would you recommend using a battery grip with 2 batteries or just the camera and one battery. I will be taking spares but am not sure which is the best option. Any guidance will be appreciated.

    Thanks. AlanFebruary 7, 2012 – 5:45 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Alan,
      While you may choose the vertical grip for other reasons, you don’t need it for aurora and batteries. If it is cold, you are better off keeping one battery in your warm pocket, and changing it out as needed. You camera/lens combo is o.k., but you will have long exposures with an f/3.5-4.5 aperture.February 7, 2012 – 1:40 pmReplyCancel

  • Peter Ward - We are going on a cruise to Norway soon, the point of which is purely to see the Northern lights. The excursion will take us into the wilderness so we can get used total darkness and, hopefully, take some photographs.
    The snag is I know little about photography. I have a Nikon Coolpix S2500. The ISO Sensitivity is 400, 800, 1600 and 3200. I will practice with the camera taking the moon and stuff before we go so I am familiar with the camera.
    Thank you for your website and the useful tips.
    Should I use ISO 3200? I could try a photo at 800 and work my way up and see how they turn out but I don’t think I will be able to fiddle about much at the temperatures we are likely to face.
    Best wishes
    Peter WardFebruary 6, 2012 – 11:31 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Peter, start at a lower ISO and work your way up, that’s all you can do in this case. Expensive cameras and expensive lenses give greater capability. Good luck.February 6, 2012 – 11:52 amReplyCancel

  • Sylvia - This information has been extremely valuable in selecting an upgraded camera. Based on the feedback you have provided, I’ve moved to the full-frame D3s and bought a 16-33 mm /f4 lens. I plan to be in Fairbanks in early March…hoping for the opportunity of a lifetime to see the lights. I want to be able to get a photo or two, Do you have suggestion of basic settings I should use…knowing that adjustments will be needed once out there. If the lights are really moving, I’m worried about a 50 sec exposure. Is there anything that can be done to bring down the exposure time? I have been told the D3s is one of the best low lights cameras and can use high ISO with minimal grain if used on a tripod. Please advise. Thanks so much for sharing your experience and knowledge so many others can enjoy and document the lights, too. You’re wonderful.February 5, 2012 – 4:33 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Sylvia,
      Exposure times will vary based on ambient light levels and the intensity of the aurora. The only thing you can do to decrease the shutter time is increase your ISO. Experiment by doing some night photography before hand.February 6, 2012 – 11:49 amReplyCancel

  • emma cornford - firstly congrats on the best website i have seen about photographing the northen lights.
    i am going to laplandin march and hope to see and photograph the lights, i have been looking at lenses for my sony alpha A200, the ones i have found are the tamron 17-50mm fstop2.8 or the tonkina 11-16mm fstop2.8.. your advice would be greatly recived.February 3, 2012 – 9:32 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Thanks Emma,
      I’m not familiar with either of those lenses or your camera. At f/2.8 both sound ok for aperture speed, I would recommend a google search for reviews on those specific lenses.February 3, 2012 – 1:09 pmReplyCancel

  • kerry - just a follow up question about lens selection. i have seen a couple of other questions regarding using the NIKKOR 2.8/14-24MM G-ED AF-S lens? is there a really big difference vs the 2.8/17-35mm lens given that the 14-24 is heavier and bulkier?

    thanksFebruary 2, 2012 – 3:49 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Kerry,
      The obvious big difference is the focal length range, I do not own the lenses so I can’t comment on quality, but you can explore reviews on that. The other consideration, unclear to me, is the propensity for lens flare on the 12-24 if the moon is out, which has happened on other lenses with large, rounded front elements. I suggest you do thorough review of the lenses on line.February 2, 2012 – 8:30 amReplyCancel

  • How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera | The Father Heart of God - […] the northern lights with a digital camera by professional photographer Patrick Endres…Via Share this:TwitterFacebookStumbleUponDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like this […]January 31, 2012 – 5:50 pmReplyCancel

  • MP - Thanks a lot Eric!!
    How do I focus on infinity using 18-55mm lens since it does not have infinity marking on it?
    MPJanuary 30, 2012 – 7:35 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - MP,
    I would not recommend the D60 for aurora due to poor performance at high ISO. The f/1.8 is a fast opening, but the focal length is too tight at 50mm x 1.5 on the d60, essentially 75mm. the 18-55 is wide enough, but is probably f/3.5 and therefore not fast enough with that camera. For the energy necessary to get aurora pictures, I would pursue a different combo if you are serious about. If you can’t, shoot the 18-55, use a remote cable, don’t go over 400 ISO, and get ready for 1-4 minute exposures.January 30, 2012 – 1:59 pmReplyCancel

  • MP - Thanks for this great article. I would be very thankful if you could please answer my following queries:
    1. I have an old Nikon D60 camera with 18-55 & 50mm1/1.8 lens. Which lens would be better suited to click Northern Lights?
    2. How do i focus on infinity, if at all this is possible with d60 and above said lenses?
    Thanks again!!
    MPJanuary 30, 2012 – 2:03 amReplyCancel

  • Darris - AMAZING! You’ve shared so much information it will take me many trips back to absorb it all . . . and happy to do so.

    If you’re ever in Northern CA I would LOVE to listen to a lecture and see a slideshow. My (college) digital photography class would jump at the chance to see your work and hear your experiences!

    Thanks so much for generously sharing your photographs and knowledge.January 27, 2012 – 9:54 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Thanks Darris, good luck with your shooting. And thanks for the invite south.January 27, 2012 – 1:53 pmReplyCancel

  • How To Capture Awesome Auroras | Country to Travel - […] blog of Alaskan photographer Patick J. Endres offers more in-depth instructions on how to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera. He explains what you will need […]January 26, 2012 – 5:27 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Shauna,
    I’m not familiar with Sony cameras. The Canon and Nikon would do fine, but the lens is important also. As stated, a lens of f/2.8 or faster is optimal.January 25, 2012 – 5:10 pmReplyCancel

  • Shauna - I check the list of what kind of camera to shoot the aurora, Sony A55 isn’t on the list. I have been considering to buy a A55 for a long time, don’t Sony also work well for shooting the aurora? I am researching on Canon T2i, Sony A55, and Nikon D90, what’s better and worthy to get. Any tips?

    Thank you.January 25, 2012 – 1:26 pmReplyCancel

  • Tricia - Hello Patrick,
    I am planning on going to Iceland in March to see the norther lights. I have a Canon 50D with the 17-85MM lens. I get the sense this isn’t the best lens for this type of work. Can you suggest a good lens, reasonably prices, that would work with my camera and be good for this type of shooting?
    Thank you,
    TriciaJanuary 25, 2012 – 10:49 amReplyCancel

  • Todd - OK I brushed up on the advice. I read this before and it helped the time I was out for the Milky Way and the Aurora came out. But tonight I’m out hunting specifically for the lights. KTUU says tonight’s the night, from Barrow to Prince William’s. Wish us luck. And thanks.January 24, 2012 – 9:04 pmReplyCancel

  • Northern Light Camera - FlyerTalk Forums - […] in October & I have an SLR (which I really need to learn to use!) This may be worth a read –…igital-camera/ Also, I think a tripod is VERY important & so is a warm battery (and/or backup battery). […]January 24, 2012 – 6:06 pmReplyCancel

  • Tom - I’m not much of a photographer yet, but the biggest noticeable missing lens on your list is the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8. It’s not cheap, but well worth a rental and if I had time to find one that is what I would be using tonight. I promise that is probably the best lens made to given the nature of the goal.January 24, 2012 – 3:52 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Tom, that is an excellent lens and I did have it listed as an option. See lenses…January 25, 2012 – 7:44 amReplyCancel

  • Denise - Thank you for all of the info. I live in Fort McMurray Alberta. I have been trying to catch the northern lights for 2 years. F stop and timing are my problems. Maybe tonight I will do it. I use a Pentax cameraJanuary 24, 2012 – 3:18 pmReplyCancel

  • Kate Hannon - Weather report says we may be able to see them in Massachusetts tonight. This is a great article. I also learned much about noise reduction that will serve me well in all my night photography. Thank you for sharing.January 24, 2012 – 9:36 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Mike,
    Good luck on the aurora shooting. I travel often, but send me an email and I can try to respond to your questions.January 18, 2012 – 8:27 amReplyCancel

  • Michael Weathers - Patrick,

    I also live in Fairbanks, (and own a Canon T1i with a few lenses). These are some great shooting tips! I have yet to capture the northern lights, I am currently deployed. However, when I return I will be purchasing my 4th lens and I think I will be ready to start shooting some great photos. I would love to be able to maybe correspond with you in reference to photography and what my goals are and get your opinions if that would be alright with you. I am so excited to get back home to my family and get back to continuing my portfolio.

    Thank you

    MikeJanuary 18, 2012 – 7:06 amReplyCancel

  • How to capture amazing photos of a starlit sky. | Photo Bucket - […] SpaceStrobist: How to Photograph Christmas LightsHow to Decorate a Starlight Wedding | eHow.comHow to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera.Hobbies & Science – How To Information | eHow.comHigh mileage trikes and morePicasa Web […]January 11, 2012 – 3:02 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Mark,
    Do not use any filter when photographing the aurora, you can use a polarizer for other daytime shooting however.January 10, 2012 – 4:06 amReplyCancel

  • mark - hi,im going to Norway,end of feb,still not sure regarding filter’s can i still use a polariser?
    many thanks Mark.January 10, 2012 – 2:14 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Jaas, do not use any filter when shooting the aurora.January 9, 2012 – 7:21 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Alice,
    You need a tripod, a mono wont do it.January 9, 2012 – 7:19 pmReplyCancel

  • Jaas - Hello,

    Terrific info about the northernlight-photography. In the article you say no filter in front of the lens. Do you mean any filter?
    Or can I use a pol filter?


    JaasJanuary 9, 2012 – 1:17 pmReplyCancel

  • Alice Woody - Patrick,

    I plan to be in Fairbanks and then in Coldfoot (perhaps there is a warning in that name!) in mid-March. I have a good, but heavy tripod. I know I should not admit this, but I rarely use the tripod, hand holding or using a rock or stump to steady the camera, because of the extra weight from lugging the tripod. I was wondering about using a monopod for shooting the aurora. Do you think that is feasible? Or is it crazy?

    I add my thanks and praises for your blog to those of your other admirers.

    Kind regards,
    AliceJanuary 8, 2012 – 6:49 pmReplyCancel

  • Matt Byham - Hi Patrick – what a great article, thanks for all the tips. I’m off to hopefully capture the Northern lights in a couple of weeks and am now exited that i might be able to get some images if i am lucky.

    I have a Panasonic Lumix G3 camera with the standard lens 14-42mm f3.5 (35mm equivalent: 28-84mm) and am wondering if i would benefit from a any of the following three Lumix lenses that i am considering:

    14mm pancake lens f2.5 (35mm equivalent: 28mm), but i’m not sure how much difference the slightly better f-stop will make in practice?

    20mm pancake lens f1.7 (35mm equivalent: 40mm)

    7-14mm f4.0 (35mm equivalent: 14-28mm)

    I would really appreciate your feed back. Thanks in advance – MattJanuary 4, 2012 – 7:55 amReplyCancel

  • Jan Armor - Tons and tons of useful info. Thanks a bunch for take the time and effort to post this. Although I live in RI, which is not exactly north of anything except NYC, I do enjoy low light shooting and your tips and techniques certainly apply. Muchos gracias!

    Jan ArmorJanuary 2, 2012 – 6:16 amReplyCancel

  • Chris Armstrong - Thanks for the advice Patrick, I leave tomorrow so I will let you know how it goes! Thanks again

    ChrisJanuary 2, 2012 – 3:07 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Hi Chris,
    While it is possible to have condensation problems, it is not really common if you follow a few basics. If you take your camera from a cold temp to a warm one, then condensation may arise. To mitigate that, put your camera in a photo bag, zip lock bag, or thick down coat when you go inside and let it come up to room temperature slowly. When you are outside, condensation won’t be a problem. FYI, in 20 years, I’ve never had a problem with it, and I just put my camera in a camera bag when going inside.
    Good luckDecember 29, 2011 – 6:52 pmReplyCancel

  • Chris Armstrong - Hi Patrick

    Great article, I was wondering if I could pick your brains a bit more?! I am going to Sweden next week and was hoping to photograph the northern lights. I have a canon 60d and a sigma 10-20mm ex lens. I have read that problems can arise with condensation forming on the camera and was wondering if you had any tips on preventing damage to camera or lens? I am staying in various cabins during my trip without electricity so will be taking several spare batteries to last!

    Many thanks

    ChrisDecember 29, 2011 – 12:31 pmReplyCancel

  • kerry ritz - @patrick. thanks for the advice on the tripod. i have a question regarding best lens. i am using Nikon 3100 and have a 18-55mm f3.5. it would appear that i will need to have a much longer exposure at 3.5. however, there are a few lens rental options available:
    24mm 1.4 (most expensive); 20mm 2.8; 17-35 zoom 2.8. in terms of price/value trade off, which would be best option: zoom or fixed focal length (ie does zoom give me a bit more flexibility?); or should i just bite the bullet and rent the lens with the lowest possible aperture?December 29, 2011 – 8:38 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Kerry,
      I would advise the 16-35mm or the 17-35mm f/2.8 lenses. They are versatile for other work, and are wide enough for a aurora. The 24mm 1.4 is a fast lens, but very difficult to achieve critical focus. Good luck.December 29, 2011 – 10:06 amReplyCancel

  • Kerry ritz - Patrick
    This is one of the best sights i have read on photographing northern lights!

    We will be heading to tromso in february. One option is to rent a tripod from tour company for my nikon3100. Or i can buy a tripod. However i dont want to spend a lot of money since i wont be using it very often. Weight is critical since all my photography involves travel. But i also want it to somewhat stable in snow(at least forb2 days i will be in norway). And my longest lens is 70-200 but the tripod is likely to be used with smaller lens,.
    Your sugestions above are quite expensive for expected use. Do you have any other recommendations based on your guests’ experiences?
    Many thanks
    KerryDecember 26, 2011 – 9:08 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Hi Kerry,
      If you don’t plan to use the tripod much, then I would agree my recommendations are expensive. However, for decent aurora photography, a good tripod makes a lot of difference. I would check into renting one, although I don’t have any rental recommendations. You might inquire at http://www.lensrentals.comDecember 28, 2011 – 9:00 amReplyCancel

  • George Camilleri - Hi Patrick, I have found this second hand camera, do you think it will do the job Olympus 5060 wide zoom?

    Or if you have any shop that I can search in.

    Many thanks
    MaltaDecember 1, 2011 – 8:47 pmReplyCancel

  • Jenn Grover - I can’t thank you enough for posting this tips. I might have the opportunity to spend a few nights in northern Finland this winter and I would love to make the most of the time! Not only was the content valuable, your present it well!November 30, 2011 – 3:23 pmReplyCancel

  • Maxime - Hi Patrick, first of all thank’s a lot for this amazing article !

    So full of information! I’ve got a question about the temperature..
    In such cold temperatures, isn’t there any chance to have my camera (Canon 60D) inactive ? Do I need a kind of sealed case or do you think it will make it just like that with the tape on the lens to block the focus ?

    Same question with Canon 550D please :)

    thxNovember 28, 2011 – 12:25 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick Endres - Maxime, Most cameras do quite well in the cold, save for the batteries. You should be fine without any special case.December 5, 2011 – 8:56 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick Endres - Ireri,
    I’m not sure about in aurora in that region, try a google search on that.November 17, 2011 – 9:58 amReplyCancel

  • Ireri - Hi! I Williams g to scotland tris december i would like to know if i can see some northern lights in there. Kyle of tontis is the name if one city in northern scotland can you help me with this?November 16, 2011 – 2:19 pmReplyCancel

  • Rodrigo Roesch - Hi Patrick

    Sure, I already sent it. Let me know when you see it

    Thank youNovember 12, 2011 – 10:57 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick - Rodrigo,
    I have never used that lens, perhaps you could email me a hi res version of a photo taken with it. I’d like to see what it looks like.November 12, 2011 – 11:36 amReplyCancel

  • Rodrigo Roesch - Patrick,

    Thank you so much for the information. By the way, I just bought a new lens. It is the Rokinon 14 mm, F2.8, fully manual. So far I tested it during the last red aurora display and the lens outperformed my canon 17-40mm F4, at the corners and color. Have you ever used this lens?November 11, 2011 – 1:55 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick - Rodrigo,
    My basic workflow in grading a RAW file taken of the aurora consists of tweaking many of the attributes, which include temperature, tint, exposure, brightness, contrast, vibrance, noise reduction, etc., By nature of a RAW file, it has not particular profile attached to it, like in the days of shooting specific film types, so its up to you to render it in the fashion you find most appropriate. As for what that is… it depends on the person. Aurora captured on a camera rarely looks like the eye saw it anyway, since you are dealing with a timed exposure, and a digital sensor that is able to capture colors that it is hard to see with the human eye. I try not to change the scene much from what the camera captured, in terms of color or saturation, but I do work on them heavily in LR to make tonality and contrast appropriate.November 11, 2011 – 11:48 amReplyCancel

  • Rodrigo Roesch - Hi Patrick

    Thank you again for all the useful tips about northern lights photography. You pictures are fantastic. I just have a question. What is your criteria for photo enhancement. I usually improve my pictures by slightly touching highlights and shadows (so I can see more details of the aurora), contras and saturation as well as applying noise reduction and sharpening. Sometimes, I also improve exposure when I overexpose or underexpose the pic a bit. Do you think it is valid? or pictures should not be changed at all? I never change hues or colors.
    Thank you so muchNovember 10, 2011 – 1:37 pmReplyCancel

  • achal garg - Hi

    Firstly, I love your photographs, and I wish I could intern with you, do you by any chance take interns?…Anyway, I am from India and I am coming to LA to see my brother this december. We were planning to visit Alaska, but I’m afraid that’s not a very good season especially if you wanna see the aurorae(as per the stats)..pls suggest what I should do I really wanna visit Alaska once and after this it might be really impossible for me…Also the thought of extremely cold temps is a bit scary..but I can manage, ‘coz the will power right now is a little too pushy…November 6, 2011 – 7:34 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick - Achal,
      Thanks for you comments. If you want to see the aurora, come to Alaska in late August early to mid-September. It is still warm, but just beginning to get dark enough at night to see the aurora. Good luck.November 7, 2011 – 7:43 amReplyCancel

  • Rick LaRosa - Hi Patrick and all who follow this great site / blog – Our family just came back from a week+ trip into and around Fairbanks. We went specifically to see the aurora and studied Patrick’s advice religiously before we started our trip. Like many before us I’m back to report the advice was priceless!!! We felt very prepared, came back with tons of great photos (we got very luck with clear nights and two level 4 aurora alert nights) and lots of great memories. We did plan our trip properly too around a new moon, solar rotation, dark skies and historically active months but the advise on cold weather gear, camera equipment and locations was excellent. Can’t thank Patrick enough for all his experience, advice and (more than anything else) his willingness to share all this. We shot with a 17mm and a 15mm at 2.8 on a canon 5d and an astro-modified canon 50d. Stopped by UAF to get advice on viewing locations (they recommended the parking area near Skiland) and we found milepost 52 on the Elliot Hwy great and easily accessible. Anyway, THANKS for everything!, – RickOctober 5, 2011 – 7:27 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick - Rick, you are most welcome. I’m delighted you found the information helpful and your efforts productive.October 6, 2011 – 9:49 pmReplyCancel

  • Robert Paige - Patrick,
    Thanks again for the site i referance it just about everyday just to see if there is any new tips or tricks… but i got a question for you; i just got a f2.8 15mm fish-eye and i was wondering what your take would be on this. i shoot with a rebel t2i and this is the first wide angle lens that i own. if there is any other lens that i should get and/or how to use it would be much appriceated. thanks again for your time.

    -PaigeOctober 5, 2011 – 6:53 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick - Robert,
      The 15mm 2.8 should be a fun lens. Be careful of distortion, which can work for you or against you depending on what you seek to portray. Using one lens for a bit is a great way to start. Once you have a handle on how that produces you can explore other lenses that are fast and wide.October 6, 2011 – 9:52 pmReplyCancel

  • Libby - Patrick, thank you again for your wonderful tips on photographing the Aurora. My husband and I will leave for Fairbanks in another week. My worry is the storage of my photographs. I shoot in RAW – big files – and I am very worried about losing another external hard drive (I left one on the train once, and another got erased by accident! AACCKK!!). I would like to try one of the “clouds” but it looks as if these places turn your photos into jpegs. I tried to upload ONE photo to Dropbox and it took 8 minutes. Since I will have thousands maybe this won’t work. Do you use one of these services?
    Thank you!October 4, 2011 – 1:27 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick - LIbby,
      There are many cloud services available. I use the one associated with my website, which offers 1TB of storage with the monthly pro account fee. I’m not familiar specifically with other cloud storage options, but I know there are many out there. A thorough google search should return some good options.October 6, 2011 – 9:55 pmReplyCancel

  • What we’ve been reading in…September | | Blog: Shopping Deals UK, Discount Codes, Price Comparisons, News & Reviews - […] keen to learn how to photograph the northern lights will find this lesson by Patrick J. Endres on very useful. In my own article called ‘Astronomy Gastronomy: The Northern Lights’, I advised […]September 30, 2011 – 1:43 amReplyCancel

  • Jay Patel - Hi Patrick,

    This is an excellent write up. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge.

    -JaySeptember 28, 2011 – 4:09 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick - Nigel,
    Given the equipment you have, which should be sufficient, be aware that your exposures will be a little longer when shooting at f/3.5. For that reason, you want the flexibility of having a longer exposure than 30 seconds, which if I remember correctly, is the limit of the wireless remote. (are you sure it works in bulb mode? – if it does, your set, but I’m skeptical) If it does not exceed a 30 second exposure, get a remote that connects directly to the camera. Other than that, experiment and have fun.September 21, 2011 – 3:19 pmReplyCancel

  • Nigel Final - Hi… Thank you for an excellent article re photographing the Northern Lights.

    I live in a very remote part of Scotland about 30 miles south of Aberdeen and what I lack in Camera equipment I think will be partially offset by the location. The position I have in mind is just 100 yards from my house and I can park the car right where my tripod will be standing. There will be no street lights and I will be in the total dark with a clear view of the sky from NE to SW.

    I own a Cannon EOS 500d and various lenses but the one that I will be using will be my Tamron 18 – 270 f3.5. I also have a wireless remote that works with the bulb setting.

    My location here might not give the spectacular results that you get in Alaska but I hope and believe that I will get some reasonable pictures. I will follow your suggestions to the word and look forward to some decent photos from the depths of Northern Scotland :smile:

    Given the equipment that I have if you have any other suggestions I would love to know what they might be but I respect that you are a busy person and cannot reply to many e-mails.

    Once again, Thank You for a very helpful article.


    Nigel Final.September 21, 2011 – 3:10 pmReplyCancel

  • Nike Shoes Australia - Thank you!!Looking forward to your better and better articles.September 15, 2011 – 5:46 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick - That’s a long haul from Florida, it should be a fantastic trip. In the best scenario, you would not see the northern lights until about late August to early September because of daylight. Keep that in mind.September 15, 2011 – 7:55 amReplyCancel

  • Best Photography Portfolios - We are looking at making the drive from S Florida to Fairbanks this summer while pulling a cargo trailer. I would like to see the lights at Fairbanks.

    Any suggestions on how to make this long drive memorable with my photography passion ?September 15, 2011 – 3:02 amReplyCancel

  • Rodrigo Roesch - Hi Patrick
    Thank you for the information. I guess, I will live with that :). The aurora pics come very nice in general with this lense (even here at Green Bay, WI). The color correction for the lens is very good too, the only think I wish is if the lense would be a bit faster.
    Best regards,
    RodrigoSeptember 13, 2011 – 2:01 pmReplyCancel

  • Rodrigo Roesch - Hi Patrick

    Do you have any experience with Canon 17-40mm F4? This is the lens I have been using for auroras but stars are not good at the corners at 17mm F4. I wonder if my lense needs repair or it is the way this lense is
    Thank you
    RodrigoSeptember 13, 2011 – 12:39 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick - Rodrigo,
      I have not used the 17-40 for aurora photography. I can tell you however, that all lenses that I have used, including non-zoom primes, at wide open apertures, all degrade in quality at the corners. This is exhibited in loss of sharpness but specifically in what I call flying birds (although there is surely a technical name that I’ve forgotten) which is the stretching of the stars. It appears as though they have wings. Unfortunately, it is something to contend with.September 13, 2011 – 12:44 pmReplyCancel

  • Rodrigo Roesch - Thank you for the article, it is very usefull. I also could add using Noise Ninja for noise reduction. It works very well and you can skip long exposure noise reduction and save time.September 12, 2011 – 12:40 pmReplyCancel

  • Une chasse aux aurores boréales ? | Club Plein Air Altitude - […] Si vous comptez prendre des photos, enlevez les filtres des objectifs si vous en avez, j’en ai loupé pas mal à cause de ça (des ronds concentriques apparaissent sur l’image). Il y’a un guide assez bien fait qui explique bien comment se préparer. […]September 9, 2011 – 7:48 pmReplyCancel

  • Libby - Thank you, Patrick, for a most thorough article. My husband and I are coming to Fairbanks in order to see/photograph the Aurora, so I’m beginning to think I would not have had a ghost of a chance if I hadn’t come across your very helpful instructions.
    Are there any particular sites for the photographs in Fairbanks that you could recommend?August 27, 2011 – 6:58 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick - Libby,
      The main thing about shooting near Fairbanks is getting away from the city light pollution. So I would recommend locations along the Chena Hot Springs road, or the Steese or Elliot highways. One need not drive far from town to the north or east to get away from the city lights.August 30, 2011 – 7:40 amReplyCancel

  • Blog de Laura » Blog Archive » Un proyecto - […] información posible y aprovecho para dar las gracias a los que ya me habéis echado una mano, dejo un buen enlace que me será de gran utilidad, con sólo ver la imagen del autor, Patrick J. Endres, puedes […]August 17, 2011 – 1:13 pmReplyCancel

  • Quick.... - […] […]August 10, 2011 – 8:19 amReplyCancel

  • Rick - Our family is making a trip up to Fairbanks this year at the end of September / early October just for the Aurora. Can’t wait! Your site IS the best I’ve seen to help us get ready and for our photography time. Want to join us for a night? Thanks! – RickAugust 7, 2011 – 2:18 pmReplyCancel

  • alaskantiger (Anchorage DE) - Link back- thanks for helping the tourists understand how to capture the Lights before they come up.August 4, 2011 – 10:36 amReplyCancel

  • Shawn - Thanks much for a great article! Been shooting distant Northern Lights right here in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Lots of fun but having them low on the horizon at great distance does not make it easy (or dramatic).July 6, 2011 – 11:06 amReplyCancel

    • Patrick - Shawn, You are welcome, and I’m sure it is a challenge shooting aurora that far south!July 9, 2011 – 7:58 amReplyCancel

  • Therein » Blog Archive » alaska northern lights pictures - […] How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera … Mar 15, 2011 … By Photographer Patrick J. Endres Updated 3/15/2011 If you find the information here helpful please … […]June 3, 2011 – 1:39 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick - Good luck Andrea!May 27, 2011 – 7:03 amReplyCancel

  • Andrea - Thanks for posting this great guide! We will be in Iceland this weekend–probably too late for the aurora but it doesn’t hurt to be prepared during those very short dark hours that are left. I’ll be sure to share any results if we happen to get any!May 23, 2011 – 2:03 pmReplyCancel

  • Obtaining » Blog Archive » northern lights photos - […] How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera … Mar 15, 2011 … By Photographer Patrick J. Endres Updated 3/15/2011 If you find the information here helpful please … […]May 19, 2011 – 7:29 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick - Thanks Jake, Maria and Martha, I’m glad you found the article helpful. Good luck with your shooting.May 17, 2011 – 8:32 amReplyCancel

  • marthalay - wow..what a complete information….thanks a lot..i am surfing the internet for my next trip to see aurora and here iam, got it all..May 13, 2011 – 7:29 pmReplyCancel

  • Maria Kirkwood - HI

    Wow! I found your website amazing. The photo’s were wonderful to look at and my dream is to one day come and see the Northern Lights myself. I am even more determind since seeing your pictures. I also found all your additional information very interesting and very helpful. We are very lucky that we have people like you that can capture such wonders of our world.

    Thank you

    MariaApril 23, 2011 – 10:32 pmReplyCancel

  • Iceland Aurora Borealis / Seltjarnarnes Lighthouse, Grotta | Photography Iceland - […] times and with whatever gear you have access to.  A great place to start on the web is:  Alaska Photography Blog, which is a fantastic BLOG with amazing photos and detailed […]March 27, 2011 – 7:37 amReplyCancel

  • Behind the Shutter - Aurora Ribbon Overhead - […] First, Patrick Endres has a great article about how to shoot aurora that is way more detailed than what I am going to go into here, but seriously read his blog it is amazing. […]March 26, 2011 – 11:37 pmReplyCancel

  • jake - thanks for the article its really informative and helpful – i have just got my first camera; a Fuji fine pix HS10 super zoom, in order to go to Iceland next week, and heres hoping see the aurora Borealis thanks again for your tips :)March 25, 2011 – 4:03 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick - Robin,
    Good luck, share your results.March 23, 2011 – 9:18 pmReplyCancel

  • Nick Cerone Jr - IT WORKED!!…Had a great show of the Aurora last night and managed to get some great images (at least to me).. Hope to experiment some more before the 24 hour daylight takes over.. Thanks again for your help..Best of Luck to Everyone.~PeaceMarch 23, 2011 – 8:22 pmReplyCancel

    • Patrick - Fantastic Nick,
      Glad to hear of your successful sky and camera connection. Keep on shooting…March 23, 2011 – 8:31 pmReplyCancel

  • Robin McCann - Very helpful advice, now I only have to hope to see the lights. will be in northern Norway in two weeks. I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ50 and although it’s not an SLR takes great night shots. So here’s hoping.March 23, 2011 – 7:15 pmReplyCancel

  • Patrick - Nic,
    You are welcome. I will continue to update this article, so check back. Good luck up there, the daylight must be rushing in on you by now.March 22, 2011 – 12:14 pmReplyCancel

  • Nick Cerone Jr - Thanks for the help. I’m currently on the north slope and hope to try and get some pics of the aurora. I’m using a cannon t1a slr with 15-55 and 55-250 lenses..It’s the first “real”camera I’ve ever had and I’m completely overwhelmed by all its capabilities. I’ll be refering back to your site I’m sure for more hints and ideas… Thanks!

    ~NickMarch 22, 2011 – 10:23 amReplyCancel

  • Patrick - Eric,
    You’re welcome. Definitely shoot in RAW or RAW/JPEG if the camera permits. I have not tested that Rebel, so I can’t comment on image quality. Do a little experimenting. Long exposures are o.k. if the aurora is not moving too quickly, you can then bring your ISO down a bit. You may find acceptable results even at 1600 ISO.

    If you shoot in RAW, it does not matter much what your white balance is since that is all tweaked in post production. However, auto white balance is what I use and makes a pretty good starting point. Some slight cooling is often necessary, but it depends on aurora color, intensity, moonlight, etc.March 21, 2011 – 4:08 pmReplyCancel

  • Brian Weeks - Great Article!

    How do you usually set your white balance ?

    Thanks!March 21, 2011 – 3:41 pmReplyCancel

  • Eric Koz - Thank you so much for writing down this information! I bought my first DSLR (Canon Rebel XTi) last spring and have been hooked on photography since then. I recently bought a Tamron 18-270 lens (to replace my “entry level” Canon EF 18-55 and 75-300 lenses). Two weeks ago I managed to get a few good shots of the northern lights from here in ANC. This weekend I will be in Talkeetna and the forecast looks excellent, I am hoping to get some better shots.

    I have shot in RAW a few times, and I think I need to better understand my editing software before I can really utilize all of it’s capabilities, but the information in your blog makes me want to use RAW more often.

    My camera’s ISO only goes up to 1600, and the f-stop on my new lens stops at 3.5 – do you have any suggestions for how I can get the best images of the northern lights (given these constraints?)

    Thanks for your help and information!! -EricMarch 21, 2011 – 11:28 amReplyCancel

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *